What is a drought-to-flood transition? Pitfalls and recommendations for defining consecutive hydrological extreme events
Anderson, Bailey J.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5936-3346; Muñoz-Castro, Eduardo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0314-3563; Tallaksen, Lena M.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8480-7842; Matano, Alessia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9735-0589; Götte, Jonas
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4523-8026; Armitage, Rachael
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5338-4756; Magee, Eugene; Brunner, Manuela I.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-877X.
2025
What is a drought-to-flood transition? Pitfalls and recommendations for defining consecutive hydrological extreme events.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 29 (21).
6069-6092.
10.5194/hess-29-6069-2025
Preview |
Text
N539295JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
Research into rapid transitions between hydrological drought and flood is growing in popularity, in part due to media-reported catastrophic impacts from recent events. Droughts and floods are typically studied as events that are independent from one another. Thus, a clear definition and assessment of the methods used to define consecutive drought-to-flood transition events does not yet exist. Here, we use a series of eight catchments that have experienced real-world impacts from drought-to-flood transitions as case studies. We assess the suitability of and differences between event selection methods applied to observational data. We demonstrate that different threshold level methods can alter the characteristics of selected events. The number and timing of transitions differs substantially between threshold level approaches in highly seasonal regimes as opposed to those with a weaker seasonality. The time period used to define the maximum interval between drought and flood also influences whether transitions are detected. We show that the probability of a transition occurring within a set time window could vary substantially between different methodologies and catchments. We also show that previously applied methodologies would likely fail to detect transition events that have been broadly impactful in the historical record. For the eight case study events taken from media, governmental and scientific reports, only three of the transitions were successfully detected. We qualitatively assessed the streamflow time series of the case study catchments, and outline a number of potential pitfalls in the event detection process. Finally, we make recommendations regarding methodological choices in the context of potential impacts of interest, and outline some priorities for future methodological development and research.
| Item Type: | Publication - Article |
|---|---|
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.5194/hess-29-6069-2025 |
| UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: | Water and Climate Science (2025-) |
| ISSN: | 1027-5606 |
| Additional Information: | Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link. |
| NORA Subject Terms: | Hydrology Meteorology and Climatology |
| Date made live: | 23 Apr 2025 08:27 +0 (UTC) |
| URI: | https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/539295 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Document Downloads
Downloads for past 30 days
Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric
Altmetric