Passive breath monitoring of livestock: using factor analysis to deconvolve the cattle shed

Langford, Ben ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6968-5197; Cash, James; Beel, Georgia; Di Marco, Chiara F.; Duthie, Carol-Anne; Haskell, Marie; Miller, Gemma; Nicoll, Laura; Roberts, Craig S.; Nemitz, Eiko ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-6298. 2022 Passive breath monitoring of livestock: using factor analysis to deconvolve the cattle shed. Journal of Breath Research, 16 (2), 026005. 16, pp. 10.1088/1752-7163/ac4d08

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N531857JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (38MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Respiratory and metabolic diseases in livestock cost the agriculture sector billions each year, with delayed diagnosis a key exacerbating factor. Previous studies have shown the potential for breath analysis to successfully identify incidence of disease in a range of livestock. However, these techniques typically involve animal handling, the use of nasal swabs or fixing a mask to individual animals to obtain a sample of breath. Using a cohort of 26 cattle as an example, we show how the breath of individual animals within a herd can be monitored using a passive sampling system, where no such handling is required. These benefits come at the cost of the desired breath samples unavoidably mixed with the complex cocktail of odours that are present within the cattle shed. Data were analysed using positive matrix factorisation (PMF) to identify and remove non-breath related sources of VOC. In total three breath factors were identified (endogenous-, non-endogenous breath and rumen) and seven factors related to other sources within and around the cattle shed (e.g. foodcattle feed, traffic, urine and faeces). Simulation of a respiratory disease within the herd showed that the abnormal change in breath composition were captured in the residuals of the 10 factor PMF solution, highlighting the importance of their inclusion as part of the breath fraction. Increasing the number of PMF factors to 17 saw the identification of a "diseased" factor, which coincided with the visits of the three "diseased" cattle to the breath monitor platform. This work highlights the important role that factor analysis techniques can play in analysing passive breath monitoring data.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.1088/1752-7163/ac4d08
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Atmospheric Chemistry and Effects (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	1752-7155
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	volatile organic compounds, positive matrix factorization, PTR-TOF, breath, cattle, respiratory disease
NORA Subject Terms:	Health Agriculture and Soil Science Atmospheric Sciences
Date made live:	31 Jan 2022 15:04 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/531857

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...