Explore open access research and scholarly works from NERC Open Research Archive

Advanced Search

Energetic outer radiation belt electron precipitation during recurrent solar activity

Clilverd, Mark A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-1529; Rodger, Craig J.; Moffat-Griffin, Tracy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9670-6715; Spanswick, Emma; Breen, Paul ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-3807; Menk, Frederick W.; Grew, Russell S.; Hayashi, Kanji; Mann, Ian R.. 2010 Energetic outer radiation belt electron precipitation during recurrent solar activity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115 (A8), A08323. 14, pp. 10.1029/2009JA015204

Abstract
Transmissions from three U.S. VLF (very low frequency) transmitters were received at Churchill, Canada, during an event study in May to November, 2007. This period spans four cycles of recurrent geomagnetic activity spaced similar to 27 days apart, with daily Sigma Kp reaching similar to 30 at the peaks of the disturbances. The difference in the amplitude of the signals received during the day and during the night varied systematically with geomagnetic activity, and was used here as a proxy for ionization changes caused by energetic electron precipitation. For the most intense of the recurrent geomagnetic storms there was evidence of electron precipitation from 3 < L < 7 for 10-15 days after the peak of the disturbance, as measured by Sigma Kp and Dst. This was consistent with the time variation of the fluxes of Polar Operational Environmental Satellites (POES) > 300 keV and similar to 1 MeV trapped electrons, and also consistent with the daily average ULF (ultralow frequency) Pc1-2 power (L = 3.9) from Lucky Lake, Canada, which was elevated during the similar to 1 MeV electron precipitation period. This suggests that Pc1-2 waves may play a role in outer radiation belt loss processes during this interval. We show that the > 300 keV trapped electron flux from POES is a reasonable proxy for electron precipitation during recurrent high-speed solar wind streams, although it did not describe all of the variability that occurred. While energetic electron precipitation can be described through a proxy such as Kp or Dst, careful incorporation of time delays for different electron energies must be included. Dst was found to be the most accurate proxy for electron precipitation during the weak recurrent-activity period studied.
Documents
11228:49468
[thumbnail of jgra20502.pdf]
Preview
jgra20502.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview
Information
Programmes:
UNSPECIFIED
Library
Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email
View Item