Copplestone, D.; Andersson, P.; Beresford, N.A.; Brown, J.; Dysvik, S.; Garnier-Laplace, J.; Hingston, J.; Howard, B.J.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9524; Oughton, D.; Whitehouse, P..
2009
Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a
regulatory context (PROTECT): Review of current regulatory
approaches to both chemicals and radioactive substances.
Radioprotection, 44 (5).
881-886.
10.1051/radiopro/20095157
Abstract
Assessment tools and frameworks have been developed that allow environmental assessments to
be conducted and which can be used to demonstrate whether non-human species are protected from the
impact of exposure to ionising radiation released under regulation. Frameworks are often tiered, increasing
in the level of complexity, input data requirements and need for expert involvement as the assessment
moves to successively higher tiers. These are, conceptually, similar to assessment approaches available
for chemical risk assessment. What criteria (e.g. numeric benchmarks) should be used, and how these
should be defined, are currently under debate, but it is likely that use will be made of approaches developed
for setting assessment criteria for chemicals. However it will be necessary to ensure that any assessment
criteria developed are fit for use in a regulatory context. This paper reviews the similarities and differences
between regulation of, and assessment methods for, chemicals and radioactive substances and presents
recommendations regarding how components of chemicals risk assessment may be adopted for radioactive
substances.
Documents
Full text not available from this repository.
Information
Programmes:
UNSPECIFIED
Library
Metrics
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Share
![]() |
