Explore open access research and scholarly works from NERC Open Research Archive

Advanced Search

Identifying priorities for systematic Antarctic vegetation protection at the continental scale

Walshaw, Charlotte V. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-4076; García Criado, Mariana ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-6144; Hughes, Kevin A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-726X; Colesie, Claudia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1136-0290; Wauchope, Hannah S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-4616; Convey, Peter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8497-9903; Møller Gray, Andrew ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1145-9741; Lee, Jasmine R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3847-1679. 2026 Identifying priorities for systematic Antarctic vegetation protection at the continental scale. Biological Conservation, 324, 112121. 14, pp. 10.1016/j.biocon.2026.112121

Abstract

Antarctica's vegetation underpins its terrestrial ecosystems yet it is threatened by climate change, human activity and the introduction and spread of non-native species. Protecting these vegetation communities is critical to conserving all Antarctic terrestrial life. However, current protection under the Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) system is spatially uneven, leaving some vegetation communities vulnerable. In this study, we used recently derived satellite vegetation cover data at the continental scale to quantify the proportion of protected and unprotected vegetation across each of the 16 recognised Antarctic Conservation Biogeographic Regions (ACBRs). Estimates suggest that only 21.4% of Antarctica's satellite-detected terrestrial vegetation cover is protected by the current ASPA system, though acknowledging that some sparse and patchy vegetation communities may not have been detected. Protection is regionally uneven, with most ACBRs having less than 10% of their vegetation cover protected, and only one ACBR (North-west Antarctic Peninsula) reaching 27.2%. Next, using satellite and modelled vegetation data, we applied a systematic conservation planning framework to identify key sites of unprotected vegetation within each ACBR. In total, we identified 92 candidate sites to inform future protection efforts, with notable examples including Fildes Peninsula (North-west Antarctic Peninsula), Taylor Valley (South Victoria Land) and the Vestfold Hills (East Antarctica). Overall, a slightly higher proportion of sites were identified in the continental Antarctic than the maritime Antarctic. This study provides a comprehensive, evidence-based framework to inform the protection of Antarctica's vegetation. Our findings highlight gaps in the protection of Antarctic vegetation and identify opportunities for enhanced future conservation.

Documents
542646:280300
[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Open Access
1-s2.0-S0006320726004337-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0.

Download (14MB) | Preview
Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
Information
Programmes:
BAS Programmes 2015 > Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation
BAS Programmes 2015 > Palaeo-Environments, Ice Sheets and Climate Change
BAS Programmes 2015 > Organisational
Library
Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email
View Item