Complementing urban agriculture and green spaces is important for ecosystem functions and biodiversity in cities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Li, Zeyu ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9163-9545; Chen, Sihao ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-8716; Priyadarshana, Tharaka S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-5465; Lee, Myung‐Bok ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2680-5707; Xiao, Lingyun ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6167-2159; Fischer, Thomas B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1436-1221; He, Xueqing ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9530-2030; Woodcock, Ben A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951; Pagani‐Núñez, Emilio ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8839-4005. 2025 Complementing urban agriculture and green spaces is important for ecosystem functions and biodiversity in cities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ecological Solutions and Evidence, 6 (3), e70084. 11, pp. 10.1002/2688-8319.70084

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N540008JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

•1. As cities expand, they encroach on agricultural land, impacting food production and natural habitats. While urban agriculture could help address these issues, the impact of increased food production on ecosystem functions—particularly with regards to soil conservation, climate regulation and biodiversity—remains poorly understood. •2. To fill this knowledge gap, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the effects of urban agriculture on ecosystem functions (i.e. soil quality and climate regulation) and biodiversity (i.e. plants, birds, mammals, arthropods and insect pollinators). We estimated ecosystem functions and biodiversity in urban agriculture by comparing them with other urban green spaces (e.g. parks, residential gardens, green roofs) and conventional rural farms. •3. Our results overall showed that urban agriculture is in an intermediate state between the other urban green spaces and conventional rural farms in terms of environmental impacts. Urban agriculture had a positive effect on the studied ecosystem functions relative to conventional rural farms (+25%, CI95: +12% to +39%), but was equivalent in its provision of these functions to other green spaces. Urban agriculture also had a positive effect on biodiversity compared to conventional rural farms (+38%, CI95: −10 to +111%), but a negative effect compared to green spaces (−12%, CI95: −29 to +8%). Specifically, urban agriculture had 39% (CI95: −59 to −10%) lower plant diversity and abundance than that seen in other green spaces. •4. Practical implications. Our results suggest that urban agriculture's contribution to urban sustainability requires complementarity with other green spaces to effectively support ecosystem functions and biodiversity in cities. We also detected substantial issues with the classification and characterisation of urban agriculture plots. Improving conceptual and methodological consistency will continue to be a crucial challenge for urban agriculture research.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.1002/2688-8319.70084
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Biodiversity and Land Use (2025-)
ISSN:	2688-8319
Additional Information:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	sustainability, urban agriculture, urban biodiversity, urban ecology, urban green spaces, urban parks
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Related URLs:	Dataset
Date made live:	05 Aug 2025 10:54 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/540008

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...