Trophic ecology of sooty albatross, segregating mechanisms from the congeneric light-mantled sooty albatross, and conservation implications

Cherel, Y; Jaeger, A; Carravieri, A; Jaquemet, S; Phillips, RA; Wanless, RM; Richard, P. 2025 Trophic ecology of sooty albatross, segregating mechanisms from the congeneric light-mantled sooty albatross, and conservation implications. Endangered Species Research, 57. 45-57. 10.3354/esr01405

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text (Open Access) © The authors 2025 n057p045.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

The trophic ecology of the Endangered sooty albatross (SA, 4 populations) was investigated using the concept of isotopic niche as a proxy of the trophic niche, and its isotopic metrics were compared with those of the congeneric Near Threatened light-mantled sooty albatross (LMSA, 4 populations). Three features differentiated SA from LMSA. (1) Feather δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of chicks and breeding adults were overall higher in SA than LMSA. This translates to more northern foraging grounds in the former than the latter species, with SA favouring warmer subtropical waters and LMSA colder waters of the Southern Ocean where they feed in part on low trophic level prey (likely Antarctic krill) at high latitudes. (2) Interestingly, SA from the Atlantic (Gough Island) differentiate from SA of the Indian Ocean (Marion, Crozet and Amsterdam Islands) by adult birds foraging primarily within the Southern Ocean in a similar way as LMSA from South Georgia, Marion, Crozet and Kerguelen Islands. (3) Calculations of the trophic niche width at the population and individual levels showed that SA from the Indian Ocean are specialist populations, while Gough Island SA and the 4 LMSA populations are generalist populations that include both generalist and specialist individuals. Consequently, both the preferential use of warm waters and the narrow trophic niche width of SA from the southern Indian Ocean imply a higher risk for SA than LMSA of being killed by subtropical tuna longline fisheries and being negatively impacted by environmental changes. Conversely, the preferential use of cold waters together with a large trophic niche width of SA from Gough Island suggest fewer negative interactions with direct and indirect human activities.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.3354/esr01405
ISSN:	1863-5407
Additional Keywords:	Conservation, Feather, Moult, Procellariiformes, Seabird, Southern Ocean, Subtropics
Date made live:	27 May 2025 15:03 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/539498

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...