Radar versus optical: the impact of cloud cover when mapping seasonal surface water for health applications in monsoon-affected India
Uday, Gowri; Purse, Bethan V. 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5140-2710; Kelley, Douglas I. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1413-4969; Vanak, Abi; Samrat, Abhishek; Chaudhary, Anusha; Rahman, Mujeeb ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-9842; Gerard, France F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5916-5174.
2025
Radar versus optical: the impact of cloud cover when mapping seasonal surface water for health applications in monsoon-affected India.
PLoS ONE, 20 (1), e0314033.
21, pp.
10.1371/journal.pone.0314033
Preview |
Text
N538849JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
Surface water plays a vital role in the spread of infectious diseases. Information on the spatial and temporal dynamics of surface water availability is thus critical to understanding, monitoring and forecasting disease outbreaks. Before the launch of Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) missions, surface water availability has been captured at various spatial scales through approaches based on optical remote sensing data. A critical drawback of the latter is data loss due to cloud cover, however few studies have quantified this. This study evaluated data loss due to clouds in three Western Ghats (India) districts. These forest-agricultural mosaic landscapes, where water-related diseases are prevalent, experience the Indian monsoon. We compared surface water areas mapped by thresholding 10m Sentinel-1A SAR data with the optical 30m Landsat-derived Joint Research Centre (JRC) Global Surface Water product, currently the only globally available long-term monthly surface water data product. Backscatter thresholds were identified manually, and our Bayesian algorithm found these thresholds were very likely (>97%). While the Sentinel-1 SAR-based and JRC’s optical-based approach mapped surface water extent with high overall accuracy (>98%) when the cloud cover was low, the unmapped surface water area was substantial in the JRC product during the monsoon months. Across the districts, the average cloud cover in the July-August period was 92% or 90% for 2017 and 2018 respectively, resulting in 25% or 23% of the surface water area being unmapped. Also, the more detailed 10m resolution of Sentinel-1A SAR helped detect the many small water features missed by 30m JRC. Thus, for predicting water-related disease risks linked to small water features or monsoon rainfall, Sentinel-1A SAR is more effective. Finally, automatic backscatter thresholding for unvegetated surface water mapping can be effective if threshold values are adapted to regional-specific backscatter spatial and temporal variations.
| Item Type: | Publication - Article |
|---|---|
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.1371/journal.pone.0314033 |
| UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: | Biodiversity and Land Use (2025-) Hydroclimate Extremes and Resilience (2025-) |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
| Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.: | Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link. |
| NORA Subject Terms: | Electronics, Engineering and Technology Health Hydrology |
| Related URLs: | |
| Date made live: | 03 Feb 2025 14:36 +0 (UTC) |
| URI: | https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/538849 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Document Downloads
Downloads for past 30 days
Downloads per month over past year
Tools
Tools
