Remote mapping of bedrock for future cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating studies in unvisited areas of Antarctica

Adams, Jonathan R.; Mason, Philippa J.; Roberts, Stephen J.; Rood, Dylan H; Smellie, John; Nichols, Keir A.; Woodward, John; Johnson, Joanne S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4537-4447. 2025 Remote mapping of bedrock for future cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating studies in unvisited areas of Antarctica [in special issue: 17] Remote sensing, 2025, 314. 32, pp. 10.3390/rs17020314

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text (Open Access) : © 2025 by the authors. remotesensing-17-00314-v2.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (15MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating is an important technique for reconstructing glacial histories. Many of the most commonly applied cosmogenic nuclides are extracted from the mineral quartz, meaning sampling of felsic (silica-rich) rock is often preferred to sampling of mafic (silica-poor) rock for exposure dating studies. Fieldwork in remote regions such as Antarctica is subject to time constraints and considerable logistical challenges, making efficient sample recovery critical to successful research efforts. Remote sensing offers an effective way to map the geology of large areas prior to fieldwork and expedite the sampling process. In this study, we assess the viability of multispectral remote sensing to distinguish felsic from mafic rock outcrops at visible-near infrared (VNIR) and shortwave infrared (SWIR) wavelengths using both the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) and very high-resolution Worldview-3 (WV-3) imagery. We applied a combination of spectral mapping and ground truth from spectral measurements of 17 rock samples from Mount Murphy in the Amundsen Sea sector of West Antarctica. Using this approach, we identified four dominant rock types which we used as a basis for felsic–mafic differentiation: felsic granites and gneisses, and mafic basalts and fragmental hydrovolcanic rocks. Supervised classification results indicate WV-3 performs well at differentiating felsic and mafic rock types and that ASTER, while coarser, could also achieve satisfactory results and be used in concert with more targeted WV-3 image acquisitions. Finally, we present a revised felsic–mafic geological map for Mt Murphy. Overall, our results highlight the potential of spectral mapping for preliminary reconnaissance when planning future cosmogenic nuclide sampling campaigns in remote, unvisited areas of the polar regions.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.3390/rs17020314
ISSN:	2072-4292
Additional Keywords:	Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER); Antarctica; Mount Murphy; cosmogenic nuclides; multispectral; felsic-mafic differentiation; spectral mapping; supervised classification; WorldView-3.
Date made live:	30 Jan 2025 09:39 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/538331

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...