Using sub-daily precipitation for grid-based hydrological modelling across Great Britain: assessing model performance and comparing flood impacts under climate change

Kay, A.L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5526-1756; Brown, M.J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1127-0279. 2023 Using sub-daily precipitation for grid-based hydrological modelling across Great Britain: assessing model performance and comparing flood impacts under climate change. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 50, 101588. 17, pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101588

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N536345JA.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (7MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101588

Abstract/Summary

•Study region: Great Britain. •Study focus: National-scale grid-based hydrological models are usually run at fine spatial and temporal resolutions, but driving data are often not available at the required resolutions. Here, a recent observation-based hourly 1 km gridded precipitation dataset is applied with a 1 km hydrological model to simulate daily mean river flows. Performance is compared to use of equally-disaggregated and profile-disaggregated daily data, for a large number of catchments. Hourly and daily precipitation from a high-resolution convection-permitting climate model (CPM) are then used to drive the hydrological model for baseline (1980–2000) and future (2060–2080) periods, to investigate differences in potential peak flow changes. •New hydrological insights: On average, use of observation-based hourly data provides a clear improvement over equally-disaggregated daily data for high flows and peak flow bias, a small improvement for average flows and mean flow bias, but little difference for low flows. Performance in faster-responding catchments typically improves more; performance in some catchments degrades. Use of profile-disaggregated daily data provides the small mean flow bias improvement and some peak flow bias improvement, but other factors degrade. On average, future changes in peak flows from hourly CPM precipitation are only slightly larger than from equally-disaggregated daily data. Future work will look at simulation of hourly mean flows.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101588
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Hydro-climate Risks (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	2214-5818
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	hydrology, precipitation, rainfall, rainfall-runoff model, UKCP18
NORA Subject Terms:	Hydrology Meteorology and Climatology Data and Information
Date made live:	29 Nov 2023 09:20 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536345

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101588

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Hydro-climate Risks (Science Area 2017-)

ISSN:

2214-5818

Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:

Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.

Additional Keywords:

hydrology, precipitation, rainfall, rainfall-runoff model, UKCP18