Laboratory comparison of low-cost particulate matter sensors to measure transient events of pollution—part B—particle number concentrations

Bulot, Florentin Michel Jacques; Russell, Hugo Savill; Rezaei, Mohsen; Johnson, Matthew Stanley; Ossont, Steven James; Morris, Andrew Kevin Richard ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5465-411X; Basford, Philip James; Easton, Natasha Hazel Celeste; Mitchell, Hazel Louise; Foster, Gavin Lee; Loxham, Matthew; Cox, Simon James. 2023 Laboratory comparison of low-cost particulate matter sensors to measure transient events of pollution—part B—particle number concentrations. Sensors, 23 (17), 7657. 10.3390/s23177657

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
sensors-23-07657-v2.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (11MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177657

Abstract/Summary

Low-cost Particulate Matter (PM) sensors offer an excellent opportunity to improve our knowledge about this type of pollution. Their size and cost, which support multi-node network deployment, along with their temporal resolution, enable them to report fine spatio-temporal resolution for a given area. These sensors have known issues across performance metrics. Generally, the literature focuses on the PM mass concentration reported by these sensors, but some models of sensors also report Particle Number Concentrations (PNCs) segregated into different PM size ranges. In this study, eight units each of Alphasense OPC-R1, Plantower PMS5003 and Sensirion SPS30 have been exposed, under controlled conditions, to short-lived peaks of PM generated using two different combustion sources of PM, exposing the sensors’ to different particle size distributions to quantify and better understand the low-cost sensors performance across a range of relevant environmental ranges. The PNCs reported by the sensors were analysed to characterise sensor-reported particle size distribution, to determine whether sensor-reported PNCs can follow the transient variations of PM observed by the reference instruments and to determine the relative impact of different variables on the performances of the sensors. This study shows that the Alphasense OPC-R1 reported at least five size ranges independently from each other, that the Sensirion SPS30 reported two size ranges independently from each other and that all the size ranges reported by the Plantower PMS5003 were not independent of each other. It demonstrates that all sensors tested here could track the fine temporal variation of PNCs, that the Alphasense OPC-R1 could closely follow the variations of size distribution between the two sources of PM, and it shows that particle size distribution and composition are more impactful on sensor measurements than relative humidity.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.3390/s23177657
ISSN:	1424-8220
Date made live:	06 Sep 2023 11:52 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/535756

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

10.3390/s23177657

ISSN:

1424-8220

Date made live:

06 Sep 2023 11:52 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/535756