Assessing the costs of ozone pollution in India for wheat producers, consumers, and government food welfare policies

Pandey, Divya; Sharps, Katrina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3265-1505; Simpson, David; Ramaswami, Bharat; Cremades, Roger; Booth, Nathan; Jamir, Chubamenla; Büker, Patrick; Sinha, Vinayak; Sinha, Baerbel; Emberson, Lisa D.. 2023 Assessing the costs of ozone pollution in India for wheat producers, consumers, and government food welfare policies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120 (32), e2207081120. 10, pp. 10.1073/pnas.2207081120

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N535511JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

We assess wheat yield losses occurring due to ozone pollution in India and its economic burden on producers, consumers, and the government. Applying an ozone flux–based risk assessment, we show that ambient ozone levels caused a mean 14.18% reduction in wheat yields during 2008 to 2012. Furthermore, irrigated wheat was particularly sensitive to ozone-induced yield losses, indicating that ozone pollution could undermine climate-change adaptation efforts through irrigation expansion. Applying an economic model, we examine the effects of a counterfactual, “pollution-free” scenario on yield losses, wheat prices, consumer and producer welfare, and government costs. We explore three policy scenarios in which the government support farmers at observed levels of either procurement prices (fixed-price), procurement quantities (fixed-procurement), or procurement expenditure (fixed-expenditure). In pollution-free conditions, the fixed-price scenario absorbs the fall in prices, thus increasing producer welfare by USD 2.7 billion, but total welfare decreases by USD 0.24 billion as government costs increase (USD 2.9 billion). In the fixed-procurement and fixed-expenditure scenarios, ozone mitigation allows wheat prices to fall by 38.19 to 42.96%. The producers lose by USD 5.10 to 6.01 billion, but the gains to consumers and governments (USD 8.7 to 10.2 billion) outweigh these losses. These findings show that the government and consumers primarily bear the costs of ozone pollution. For pollution mitigation to optimally benefit wheat production and maximize social welfare, new approaches to support producers other than fixed-price grain procurement may be required. We also emphasize the need to consider air pollution in programs to improve agricultural resilience to climate change.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.1073/pnas.2207081120
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0027-8424
Additional Keywords:	ozone pollution, India, wheat production
NORA Subject Terms:	Agriculture and Soil Science
Related URLs:	Dataset Dataset Dataset Other
Date made live:	14 Nov 2023 15:45 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/535511

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...