Evaporative controls on Antarctic precipitation: an ECHAM6 model study using innovative water tracer diagnostics

Gao, Qinggang; Sime, Louise C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9093-7926; McLaren, Alison J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2195-1758; Bracegirdle, Thomas J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-4739; Capron, Emilie; Rhodes, Rachael H.; Steen-Larsen, Hans Christian; Shi, Xiaoxu; Werner, Martin. 2024 Evaporative controls on Antarctic precipitation: an ECHAM6 model study using innovative water tracer diagnostics. The Cryosphere, 18 (2). 683-703. 10.5194/tc-18-683-2024

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text (Open Access)
© Author(s) 2024.
tc-18-683-2024.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (14MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/18/683/2024/

Abstract/Summary

Improving our understanding of the controls on Antarctic precipitation is critical for gaining insights into past and future polar and global environmental changes. Here we develop innovative water tracing diagnostics in the atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM6. These tracers provide new detailed information on moisture source locations and properties of Antarctic precipitation. In the preindustrial simulation, annual mean Antarctic precipitation originating from the open ocean has a source latitude range of 49–35∘ S, a source sea surface temperature range of 9.8–16.3 ∘C, a source 2 m relative humidity range of 75.6 %–83.3 %, and a source 10 m wind velocity (vel10) range of 10.1 to 11.3 m s−1. These results are consistent with estimates from existing literature. Central Antarctic precipitation is sourced from more equatorward (distant) sources via elevated transport pathways compared to coastal Antarctic precipitation. This has been attributed to a moist isentropic framework; i.e. poleward vapour transport tends to follow constant equivalent potential temperature. However, we find notable deviations from this tendency especially in the lower troposphere, likely due to radiative cooling. Heavy precipitation is sourced by longer-range moisture transport: it comes from 2.9∘ (300 km, averaged over Antarctica) more equatorward (distant) sources compared to the rest of precipitation. Precipitation during negative phases of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) also comes from more equatorward moisture sources (by 2.4∘, averaged over Antarctica) compared to precipitation during positive SAM phases, likely due to amplified planetary waves during negative SAM phases. Moreover, source vel10 of annual mean precipitation is on average 2.1 m s−1 higher than annual mean vel10 at moisture source locations from which the precipitation originates. This shows that the evaporation of moisture driving Antarctic precipitation occurs under windier conditions than average. We quantified this dynamic control of Southern Ocean surface wind on moisture availability for Antarctic precipitation. Overall, the innovative water tracing diagnostics enhance our understanding of the controlling factors of Antarctic precipitation.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.5194/tc-18-683-2024
Date made live:	12 Jun 2023 08:49 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/534945

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

10.5194/tc-18-683-2024

Date made live:

12 Jun 2023 08:49 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/534945