SNR-based GNSS reflectometry for coastal sea-level altimetry: results from the first IAG inter-comparison campaign

Geremia-Nievinski, F.; Hobiger, T.; Haas, R.; Liu, W.; Strandberg, J.; Tabibi, S.; Vey, S.; Wickert, J.; Williams, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-4973. 2020 SNR-based GNSS reflectometry for coastal sea-level altimetry: results from the first IAG inter-comparison campaign. Journal of Geodesy, 94 (8). 10.1007/s00190-020-01387-3

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01387-3

Abstract/Summary

Ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) is quickly maturing toward the objective of becoming a viable alternative for operational coastal sea-level (SL) altimetry in a geocentric reference frame. SL has immense societal implications related to climate change. Of particular interest is the exploitation of existing coastal GNSS sites for reflectometry by means of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) observables. We report results from the first inter-comparison campaign on SNR-based GNSS-R. The goal was to cross-validate retrieval solutions from independent research groups under comparable conditions. This action was an initiative of the International Association of Geodesy working group 4.3.9 (2015–2019 term). Data collected at the Onsala Space Observatory for a 1-year period (2015–2016) were compared to a co-located tide gauge (TG). SNR data for the GPS L1-C/A signal were processed by four groups, in Sweden, Luxembourg/Brazil, Germany, and the UK. Semidiurnal tidal constituents showed good agreement between TG and all GNSS-R groups. SL variations at diurnal and longer periods were also well captured by all series. Most GNSS-R solutions exhibited spurious tones at integer fractions of one sidereal day, the satellite revisit time of the particular GNSS constellation employed (GPS). Band-pass filtering between 3 h and 30 h confirmed that the dominant tidal components were well captured by most GNSS-R solutions. Higher-frequency SL variations (periods < 3 h) are poorly represented by GNSS-R as a consequence of its low temporal resolution. The solution with the worst agreement neglects a correction associated with the rate of change in sea level and uses narrower satellite elevation ranges per retrieval. Overall, there was excellent agreement, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.9 and RMSE smaller than 5 cm.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.1007/s00190-020-01387-3
ISSN:	0949-7714
Date made live:	02 Mar 2021 10:35 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529784

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

10.1007/s00190-020-01387-3

ISSN:

0949-7714

Date made live:

02 Mar 2021 10:35 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529784