Explore open access research and scholarly works from NERC Open Research Archive

Advanced Search

Semi-automated analysis of microplastics in complex wastewater samples

Horton, Alice A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-6048; Cross, Richard K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5409-6552; Read, Daniel S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-5154; Juergens, Monika D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6526-589X; Ball, Hollie L.; Svendsen, Claus ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-647X; Vollertsen, Jes; Johnson, Andrew C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-3764. 2021 Semi-automated analysis of microplastics in complex wastewater samples. Environmental Pollution, 268 (A), 115841. 10, pp. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115841

Abstract
In order to assess risks to the natural environment from microplastics, it is necessary to have reliable information on all potential inputs and discharges. This relies on stringent quality control measures to ensure accurate reporting. Here we focus on wastewater treatment works (WwTWs) and the complex sample matrices these provide. Composite samples of both influent and effluent were collected over a 24 h period on two separate occasions from eight different WwTWs across the UK. Sludge samples were taken on five occasions from five WwTWs. The WwTW treatments included activated sludge, trickling filter and biological aerated flooded filter with or without tertiary treatment. Using micro-FTIR analysis, microplastics ≥25 μm were identified and quantified. Procedural blanks were used to derive limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ). Where values were above the LOQ, microplastics in the influent ranged from 955 to 17,214 microplastic particles/L and in the effluent from 2 to 54 microplastic particles/L, giving an average removal rate of 99.8%. Microplastics could be quantified in sludge at concentrations of 301–10,380 microplastics/g dry weight, this analytical method therefore revealing higher concentrations than reported in previous studies. The most common polymers present overall were polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). We also report on critical considerations for blank corrections and quality control measures to ensure reliable microplastic analysis across different sample types.
Documents
529009:165687
[thumbnail of Horton et al_Supplementary information_final.pdf]
Preview
Horton et al_Supplementary information_final.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (563kB) | Preview
529009:165688
[thumbnail of Horton et al. Wastewater paper.pdf]
Preview
Horton et al. Wastewater paper.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (549kB) | Preview
Information
Programmes:
UKCEH and CEH Science Areas 2017-24 (Lead Area only) > Pollution
NOC Programmes > Ocean BioGeosciences
Library
Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...

Downloads per month over past year for
"Horton et al_Supplementary information_final.pdf"

Downloads per month over past year for
"Horton et al. Wastewater paper.pdf"

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email
View Item