Evaluation of drydown processes in global land surface and hydrological models using flux tower evapotranspiration
Martinez-de la Torre, Alberto ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0244-5348; Blyth, Eleanor M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-238X; Robinson, Emma L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3746-4517. 2019 Evaluation of drydown processes in global land surface and hydrological models using flux tower evapotranspiration [in special issue: Hydrological and ecological systems within the terrestrial land surface] Water, 11 (2), 356. 21, pp. 10.3390/w11020356
Before downloading, please read NORA policies.Preview |
Text
N522314JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
A key aspect of the land surface response to the atmosphere is how quickly it dries after a rainfall event. It is key because it will determine the intensity and speed of the propagation of drought and also affects the atmospheric state through changes in the surface heat exchanges. Here, we test the theory that this response can be studied as an inherent property of the land surface that is unchanging over time unless the above- and below-ground structures change. This is important as a drydown metric can be used to evaluate a landscape and its response to atmospheric drivers in models used in coupled land–atmosphere mode when the forcing is often not commensurate with the actual atmosphere. We explore whether the speed of drying of a land unit can be quantified and how this can be used to evaluate models. We use the most direct observation of drying: the rate of change of evapotranspiration after a rainfall event using eddy-covariance observations, or commonly referred to as flux tower data. We analyse the data and find that the drydown timescale is characteristic of different land cover types, then we use that to evaluate a suite of global hydrological and land surface models. We show that, at the site level, the data suggest that evapotranspiration decay timescales are longer for trees than for grasslands. The studied model’s accuracy to capture the site drydown timescales depends on the specific model, the site, and the vegetation cover representation. A more robust metric is obtained by grouping the modeled data by vegetation type and, using this, we find that land surface models capture the characteristic timescale difference between trees and grasslands, found using flux data, better than large-scale hydrological models. We thus conclude that the drydown metric has value in understanding land–atmosphere interactions and model evaluation.
Item Type: | Publication - Article |
---|---|
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.3390/w11020356 |
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: | Hydro-climate Risks (Science Area 2017-) |
ISSN: | 2073-4441 |
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.: | Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link. |
Additional Keywords: | evapotranspiration, drydown, global modelling, flux tower data |
NORA Subject Terms: | Hydrology |
Date made live: | 20 Feb 2019 12:41 +0 (UTC) |
URI: | https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/522314 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Document Downloads
Downloads for past 30 days
Downloads per month over past year