Comments on the article “Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide-gauge records: Evidence from collocated sensors” by Stella Pytharouli, Spyros Chaikalis, Stathis C. Stiros in Measurement (Volume 125, September 2018)

Aarup, T.; Wöppelmann, G.; Woodworth, P.L.; Hernandez, F.; Vanhoorne, B.; Schöne, T.; Thompson, P.R.

Comments on the article “Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide-gauge records: Evidence from collocated sensors” by Stella Pytharouli, Spyros Chaikalis, Stathis C. Stiros in Measurement (Volume 125, September 2018)

Aarup, T.; Wöppelmann, G.; Woodworth, P.L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-239X; Hernandez, F.; Vanhoorne, B.; Schöne, T.; Thompson, P.R.. 2019 Comments on the article “Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide-gauge records: Evidence from collocated sensors” by Stella Pytharouli, Spyros Chaikalis, Stathis C. Stiros in Measurement (Volume 125, September 2018). Measurement, 135. 613-616. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.007

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.00...

Abstract/Summary

This note comments on the article published in Measurement by Stella Pytharouli, Spyros Chaikalis and Stathis C. Stiros (Volume 125, September 2018) entitled “Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide-gauge records: evidence from collocated sensors”. That paper comprises a set of comparisons between sea level data obtained by two or three collocated sensors at 10 sites around the world, using statistical methods akin to the buddy-checking methods that are often used by tide gauge operators. Their paper contains a number of incorrect statements. In addition, its comparison of tide gauge data at the 10 sites, which comprises most of the paper, is flawed in several respects.

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.007

ISSN:

02632241

Date made live:

18 Dec 2018 15:10 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521886