Impacts of abiotic stresses on the physiology and metabolism of cool-season grasses: a review
Loka, Dimitra; Harper, John; Humphreys, Mike; Gasior, Dagmara; Wootton-Beard, Peter; Gwynn-Jones, Dylan; Scullion, John; Doonan, John; Kingston-Smith, Alison; Dodd, Rosalind; Wang, Jinyang; Chadwick, David; Hill, Paul; Jones, Davey; Mills, Gina; Hayes, Felicity ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1037-5725; Robinson, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7290-4867. 2019 Impacts of abiotic stresses on the physiology and metabolism of cool-season grasses: a review. Food and Energy Security, 8 (1), e00152. 29, pp. 10.1002/fes3.152
Before downloading, please read NORA policies.Preview |
Text
N521437JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
Grasslands cover more than 70% of the world's agricultural land playing a pivotal role in global food security, economy, and ecology due to their flexibility and functionality. Climate change, characterized by changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, and by increased levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, is anticipated to increase both the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, such as drought, heat waves, and flooding. Potentially, climate change could severely compromise future forage crop production and should be considered a direct threat to food security. This review aimed to summarize our current understanding of the physiological and metabolic responses of temperate grasses to those abiotic stresses associated with climate change. Primarily, substantial decreases in photosynthetic rates of cool‐season grasses occur as a result of high temperatures, water‐deficit or water‐excess, and elevated ozone, but not CO2 concentrations. Those decreases are usually attributed to stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations. Additionally, while membrane instability and reactive oxygen species production was a common feature of the abiotic stress response, total antioxidant capacity showed a stress‐specific response. Furthermore, climate change‐related stresses altered carbohydrate partitioning, with implications for biomass production. While water‐deficit stress, increased CO2, and ozone concentrations resulted in higher carbohydrate content, the opposite occurred under conditions of heat stress and flooding. The extent of damage is greatly dependent on location, as well as the type and intensity of stress. Fortunately, temperate forage grass species are highly heterogeneous. Consequently, through intra‐ and in particular inter‐specific plant hybridization (e.g., Festuca x Lolium hybrids) new opportunities are available to harness, within single genotypes, gene combinations capable of combating climate change.
Item Type: | Publication - Article |
---|---|
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | 10.1002/fes3.152 |
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: | Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-) UKCEH Fellows |
ISSN: | 2048-3694 |
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.: | Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link. |
Additional Keywords: | abiotic stresses, climate change, cool-season grasses, metabolism, physiology |
NORA Subject Terms: | Ecology and Environment Botany |
Date made live: | 09 Nov 2018 10:34 +0 (UTC) |
URI: | https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/521437 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |
Document Downloads
Downloads for past 30 days
Downloads per month over past year