Explore open access research and scholarly works from NERC Open Research Archive

Advanced Search

The impact of ditch blocking on fluvial carbon export from a UK blanket bog

Evans, Christopher D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-354X; Peacock, Michael; Green, Sophie M.; Holden, Joseph; Chapman, Pippa J.; Lebron, Inma ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-9717; Callaghan, Nathan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-6161; Grayson, Richard; Baird, Andrew J.. 2018 The impact of ditch blocking on fluvial carbon export from a UK blanket bog. Hydrological Processes, 32 (13). 2141-2154. 10.1002/hyp.13158

Abstract
We investigated the effects of ditch‐blocking on fluvial carbon concentrations and fluxes at a five‐year, replicated, control‐intervention field experiment on a blanket peatland in North Wales, UK. The site was hydrologically instrumented, and runoff via open and blocked ditches was analysed for dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved carbon dioxide (CO2) and dissolved methane (CH4). DOC was also analysed in peat porewater and overland flow. The hillslope experiment was embedded within a paired control‐intervention catchment study, with three years of pre‐blocking and six years of post‐blocking data. Results from the hillslope showed large reductions in discharge via blocked ditches, with water partly redirected into hillslope surface and subsurface flows, and partly into remaining open ditches. We observed no impacts of ditch‐blocking on DOC, POC, dissolved CO2 or CH4 in ditch waters, DOC in porewaters or overland flow, or stream water DOC at the paired catchment scale. Similar DOC concentrations in ditch water, overland flow and porewater suggest that diverting flow from the ditch network to surface or subsurface flow had a limited impact on concentrations or fluxes of DOC entering the stream network. The subdued response of fluvial carbon to ditch‐blocking in our study may be attributable to the relatively low susceptibility of blanket peatlands to drainage, or to physical alterations of the peat since drainage. We conclude that ditch‐blocking cannot be always be expected to deliver reductions in fluvial carbon loss, or improvements in the quality of drinking water supplies.
Documents
520306:128907
[thumbnail of N520306PP.pdf]
Preview
N520306PP.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (1MB) | Preview
Information
Programmes:
UKCEH and CEH Science Areas 2017-24 (Lead Area only) > Soils and Land Use
Library
Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...

Metrics

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Share
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email
View Item