A national-scale assessment of climate change impacts on species: assessing the balance of risks and opportunities for multiple taxa

Pearce-Higgins, James W.; Beale, Colin M.; Oliver, Tom H.; August, Tom A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385; Carroll, Matthew; Massimino, Dario; Ockendon, Nancy; Savage, Joanna; Wheatley, Christopher J.; Ausden, Malcolm A.; Bradbury, Richard B.; Duffield, Simon J.; Macgregor, Nicholas A.; McClean, Colin J.; Morecroft, Michael D.; Thomas, Chris D.; Watts, Olly; Beckmann, Bjorn C.; Fox, Richard; Roy, Helen E. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-679X; Sutton, Peter G.; Walker, Kevin J.; Crick, Humphrey Q.P.. 2017 A national-scale assessment of climate change impacts on species: assessing the balance of risks and opportunities for multiple taxa. Biological Conservation, 213 (A). 124-134. 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.035

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.035

Abstract/Summary

It is important for conservationists to be able to assess the risks that climate change poses to species, in order to inform decision making. Using standardised and repeatable methods, we present a national-scale assessment of the risks of range loss and opportunities for range expansion that climate change could pose for over 3000 plants and animals. Species were selected by their occurrence in England, the primary focus of the study, but climate change impacts were assessed across Great Britain, widening their geographical relevance. A basic risk assessment that compared projected future changes in potential range with recently observed changes classified 21% of species as being at high risk and 6% at medium risk of range loss under a B1 climate change scenario. A greater number of species were classified as having a medium (16%) or high (38%) opportunity to potentially expand their distribution. A more comprehensive assessment, incorporating additional ecological information, including potentially confounding and exacerbating factors (e.g. dispersal, habitat availability and other constraints), was applied to 402 species, of which 35% were at risk of range loss and 42% may expand their range extent. This study covers a temperate region with a significant proportion of species at their poleward range limit; the balance of risks and opportunities from climate change may be different elsewhere. The outcome of both risk assessments varied between taxonomic groups, with bryophytes and vascular plants containing the greatest proportion of species at risk from climate change. Upland habitats contained more species at risk than other habitats. Whilst the overall pattern was clear, confidence was generally low for individual assessments, with the exception of well-studied taxa such as birds. In response to climate change, nature conservation needs to plan for changing species distributions and an uncertain future.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.035
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-) UKCEH Fellows
ISSN:	0006-3207
Additional Keywords:	adaptation, climate change, climate envelope, Great Britain, risk assessment, vulnerability
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	12 Feb 2018 16:31 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/519274

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.035

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-)
UKCEH Fellows

ISSN:

0006-3207

Additional Keywords:

adaptation, climate change, climate envelope, Great Britain, risk assessment, vulnerability

NORA Subject Terms:

Ecology and Environment