Abstract
Peter Gutteridge’s recent Soap Box article (Geoscientist 18 v.3) prompted lively
debate in the Letters page about the usefulness of lithostratigraphy. My view is that
geoscientists should make full use of all varieties of stratigraphy (lithostratigraphy ;
sequence stratigraphy; biostratigraphy; chronostratigraphy; seismic stratigraphy;
magnetostratigraphy; isotope stratigraphy etc.); they all have their place, dependent
often on scale, and the availability of data. For practical geologists these tools all
relate back to the rock record that is most readily defined by a lithostratigraphical
framework. It is the powerful combination of these branches of stratigraphy that
advances our science and allows us to communicate our ideas and research. In this
brief article I highlight the some of the work of the British Geological Survey (BGS) in
the field of lithostratigraphy, and the important collaborative links with the GSL
Stratigraphy Commission.
Documents
5177:2250
Information
Programmes:
UNSPECIFIED
Library
Statistics
Downloads per month over past year
Share
![]() |
