Woodcock, Ben A.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951; Heard, Matthew S.; Jitlal, Mark S.; Rundlof, Maj; Bullock, James M.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-4020; Shore, Richard F.; Pywell, Richard F.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6431-9959.
2016
Replication, effect sizes and identifying the biological impacts of pesticides on bees under field conditions.
Journal of Applied Ecology, 53 (5).
1358-1362.
10.1111/1365-2664.12676
Abstract
1. Honeybees have world-wide importance as crop pollinators. To ensure their persistence in
agricultural systems, statistically robust field trials of plant protection products are vital.
2. We consider the implications of regulations from the European Food Safety Authority
that require the detection of a 7% effect size change in bee colony sizes under field
conditions.
3. Based on a power analysis, we argue that the necessary levels of replication (68 replicates)
may pose practical constraints to field testing.
4. Policy implications. Regulatory studies benefit from data sources collated over a range of
spatial scales, from laboratory to landscapes. Basing effect size thresholds solely on expert
judgement, as has been done, may be inappropriate. Rather, definition through experimental or
simulation studies that assess the biological consequences of changes in colony size for bee pop-
ulations is required. This has implications for regulatory bodies outside the European Union.
Information
Programmes:
CEH Science Areas 2013- > Ecological Processes & Resilience
Library
Statistics
Downloads per month over past year
Metrics
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Share
![]() |
