Live–dead comparison of benthic foraminiferal faunas from the Rhône prodelta (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean): Development of a proxy for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions

Goineau, A.; Fontanier, C.; Mojtahid, M.; Fanget, A.-S.; Bassetti, M.-A.; Berné, S.; Jorissen, F.. 2015 Live–dead comparison of benthic foraminiferal faunas from the Rhône prodelta (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean): Development of a proxy for palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Marine Micropaleontology, 119. 17-33. 10.1016/j.marmicro.2015.07.002

Full text not available from this repository.

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2015.07.002

Abstract/Summary

Dead benthic foraminiferal faunas (> 150 μm) from the Rhône prodelta (Gulf of Lions, NW Mediterranean) were analysed at 41 stations (15–100 m water depth) sampled in June 2005 and September 2006, and compared to the living faunas investigated during previous studies at the same stations. The comparison between dead and living assemblages enhances the understanding of taphonomic processes that may modify the composition of the dead faunas in this area. We observed a loss of individuals from living to dead assemblages of species characterised by a fairly fragile test and therefore more prone to fragmentation or dissolution (e.g., Bolivina alata, Quinqueloculina tenuicollis). Allochthonous dead and/or live specimens may be transported to some parts of the prodelta, particularly the shallowest sites where hydrodynamic processes (i.e., river flood, storm swells, longshore currents) are more intense. These specimens may originate from relict deltaic structures (e.g., Elphidium spp. from the lobe of Bras de Fer) or from surrounding areas (e.g., Ammonia beccarii forma beccarii from the river). Opportunistic species (e.g., Bulimina marginata, Cassidulina carinata) characterised by high reproductive rates have much higher relative abundances in the dead than in the living fauna. Cluster analyses based on dead foraminiferal assemblages divide our study area into four main thanatofacies directly related to distinct local environmental conditions prevailing in the prodelta. Close to the river mouth, Ammonia beccarii forma beccarii and Ammonia tepida are found in sediments subject to a high riverine influence (i.e., bottom currents, high organic and inorganic material input of continental origin). Elphidium species are abundant in the silty-sandy relict deltaic lobe west of the river mouth which is characterised by strong longshore currents that disturb the benthic environment. Nonion fabum, Rectuvigerina phlegeri and Valvulineria bradyana are found along the coast west of the Rhône River mouth, in the area defined as the “river plume” thanatofacies. In the more stable and deeper prodeltaic area, species known to feed on fresh phytodetritus (e.g., Bulimina aculeata/marginata, C. carinata, Hyalinea balthica) dominate the faunas. Since only minor variations in species relative abundances and spatial distributional patterns are observed between the living and the dead faunas, we consider that our thanatofacies have not been influenced by substantial transport of dead tests. This suggests that fossil benthic foraminifera can provide a reliable tool for investigating the development of the palaeo-Rhône prodelta.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.1016/j.marmicro.2015.07.002
ISSN:	03778398
Additional Keywords:	Benthic foraminifera; Rhône prodelta; Taphonomy; Thanatofacies; Palaeoceanography
Date made live:	04 Nov 2015 15:49 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/512152

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

10.1016/j.marmicro.2015.07.002

ISSN:

03778398

Additional Keywords:

Benthic foraminifera; Rhône prodelta; Taphonomy; Thanatofacies; Palaeoceanography

Date made live:

04 Nov 2015 15:49 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/512152