Wood, C.M.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0394-2998; Norton, L.R.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1622-0281; Rowland, C.S.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-506X.
2015
What are the costs and benefits of using aerial photography to survey habitats in 1km squares?
Lancaster, UK, NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, 23pp.
(CEH Project no. C04867)
(Unpublished)
Abstract
Undertaking a field survey, such as the Countryside Survey (Carey et al., 2008) or the Welsh Glastir Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (GMEP) (Emmett and GMEP team, 2014), is a relatively expensive and time consuming way of collecting habitat data in comparison with remotely sensed techniques. In order to assess the information gained from a field survey in relation to the information that can be gained from aerial photography, a short project has been undertaken with the following objectives:
• To measure the time taken to survey a 1km square using aerial photography (for a range of different and UK representative landscape types)
• To measure the accuracy and level of detail of data derived using this method relative to data collected using field survey
• To provide an idea of time costs associated with each of the methods
• To determine the extent to which Priority Habitats can be assessed using remotely sensed methods in addition to Broad Habitats.
Documents
511330:84372
511330:87829
Information
Programmes:
CEH Science Areas 2013- > Natural Capital
Library
Statistics
Downloads per month over past year
Share
![]() |
