Do krill fisheries compete with macaroni penguins? Spatial overlap in prey consumption and catches during winter

Ratcliffe, Norman ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3375-2431; Hill, Simeon L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1441-8769; Staniland, Iain J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2736-9134; Brown, Ruth; Adlard, Stacey; Horswill, Catharine ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-0753; Trathan, Phil N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6673-9930. 2015 Do krill fisheries compete with macaroni penguins? Spatial overlap in prey consumption and catches during winter. Diversity and Distributions, 21 (11). 1339-1348. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12366

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Text
This article has been accepted for publication and will appear in a revised form in Diversity & Distributions, published by Wiley. Copyright John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Macaroni fishery paper accepted.doc - Accepted Version
Download (386kB)

Abstract/Summary

Aim To infer the potential for competition between an important Antarctic predator, the macaroni penguin, and the krill fishery by examining the spatial overlap in prey consumption and catches. Location Scotia Sea and adjacent waters. Methods The study focused on the winter period as this is the only time of the year when spatio-temporal overlaps between macaroni penguin foraging and the krill fishery can occur. We tracked adult macaroni penguins from a colony in South Georgia using global location sensors to determine winter distribution, and bioenergetics models to calculate the biomass of food consumed during the winter period. We combined these to produce a surface of the tonnes of krill consumed, which could be compared directly with the spatial distribution of the tonnes of krill caught by the fishery. Results Adult macaroni penguins from South Georgia consumed 135,826 tonnes of krill (95% CIs: 83,446–188,140) during the winter, which is similar to the 98,431 tonnes caught by fisheries over the same period. However, macaroni penguins had a very wide pelagic distribution across the Scotia Sea, whereas the fishery was restricted to three small areas on shelf edges, such that their spatial overlap was negligible. The proportion of the estimated krill stock taken by macaroni penguins and the krill fishery was small at both the scale of the Scotia Sea and the local areas within which the fisheries operate. Main conclusions Competition between macaroni penguins and the krill fishery is low under current management and far less than that among the various species of krill predators that occur in the Scotia Sea. Our method will allow quantification of changes in competition between macaroni penguins and krill fisheries should the latter expand in the future, and provides a framework for assessing predator-fishery competition in other systems.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12366
Programmes:	BAS Programmes > BAS Programmes 2015 > Ecosystems
ISSN:	1366-9516
Additional Keywords:	Antarctic krill, bioenergetics model, competition, ecosystem fisheries management, geolocation, penguin, spatio-temporal overlap
Date made live:	15 Sep 2015 10:27 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/511226

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12366

Programmes:

BAS Programmes > BAS Programmes 2015 > Ecosystems

ISSN:

1366-9516

Additional Keywords:

Antarctic krill, bioenergetics model, competition, ecosystem fisheries management, geolocation, penguin, spatio-temporal overlap

Date made live:

15 Sep 2015 10:27 +0 (UTC)