An assessment of lithostratigraphy for anthropogenic deposits

Ford, J.R.; Price, S.J.; Cooper, A.H.; Waters, C.N.. 2014 An assessment of lithostratigraphy for anthropogenic deposits. In: Waters, C.N.; Zalasiewicz, J.A.; Williams, M.; Ellis, M.; Snelling, A., (eds.) A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene. London, UK, Geological Society of London, 55-89. (Geological Society Special Publication, 395).

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text (Open Access Paper) 55.full.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (11MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

The deliberate anthropogenic movement of reworked natural and novel manufactured materials represents a novel sedimentary environment associated with mining, waste disposal, construction and urbanization. Anthropogenic deposits display distinctive engineering and environmental properties, and can be of archaeological importance. This paper shows that temporal changes in the scale and lithological character of anthropogenic deposits may be indicative of the Anthropocene. However, the stratigraphy of such deposits is not readily described by existing classification schemes, which do not differentiate separate phases or lithologically distinct deposits beyond a local scale. Lithostratigraphy is a scalable, hierarchical classification used to distinguish successive and lithologically distinct natural deposits. Many natural and anthropogenic deposits exhibit common characteristics; they typically conform to the Law (or Principle) of Superposition and exhibit lithological distinction. The lithostratigraphical classification of surficial anthropogenic deposits may be effective, although defined units may be significantly thinner and far less continuous than those defined for natural deposits. Further challenges include the designation of stratotypes, accommodating the highly diachronous nature of anthropogenic deposits and the common presence of disconformities. International lithostratigraphical guidelines would require significant modification before being effective for the classification of anthropogenic deposits. A practical alternative may be to establish an ‘anthrostratigraphical’ approach, or ‘anthrostratigraphy’.

Item Type:	Publication - Book Section
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	10.1144/SP395.12
ISSN:	0305-8719
Date made live:	11 Apr 2014 14:19 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/507025

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...