Thaxter, Chris B.; Daunt, Francis
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-3388; Gremillet, David; Harris, Mike P.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-5830; Benvenuti, Silvano; Watanuki, Yutaka; Hamer, Keith C.; Wanless, Sarah
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2788-4606.
2013
Modelling the effects of prey size and distribution on prey capture rates of two sympatric marine predators.
PLoS One, 8 (11), e79915.
10, pp.
10.1371/journal.pone.0079915
Abstract
Understanding how prey capture rates are influenced by feeding ecology and
environmental conditions is fundamental to assessing anthropogenic impacts on
marine higher predators. We compared how prey capture rates varied in relation to
prey size, prey patch distribution and prey density for two species of alcid, common
guillemot (Uria aalge) and razorbill (Alca torda) during the chick-rearing period. We
developed a Monte Carlo approach parameterised with foraging behaviour from birdborne
data loggers, observations of prey fed to chicks, and adult diet from wateroffloading,
to construct a bio-energetics model. Our primary goal was to estimate prey
capture rates, and a secondary aim was to test responses to a set of biologically
plausible environmental scenarios. Estimated prey capture rates were 1.5±0.8 items
per dive (0.8±0.4 and 1.1±0.6 items per minute foraging and underwater, respectively)
for guillemots and 3.7±2.4 items per dive (4.9±3.1 and 7.3±4.0 items per minute
foraging and underwater, respectively) for razorbills. Based on species' ecology, diet
and flight costs, we predicted that razorbills would be more sensitive to decreases in 0-
group sandeel (Ammodytes marinus) length (prediction 1), but guillemots would be
more sensitive to prey patches that were more widely spaced (prediction 2), and lower
in prey density (prediction 3). Estimated prey capture rates increased non-linearly as 0-
group sandeel length declined, with the slope being steeper in razorbills, supporting
prediction 1. When prey patches were more dispersed, estimated daily energy
expenditure increased by a factor of 3.0 for guillemots and 2.3 for razorbills, suggesting
guillemots were more sensitive to patchier prey, supporting prediction 2. However, both
species responded similarly to reduced prey density (guillemot expenditure increased
by 1.7; razorbill by 1.6), thus not supporting prediction 3. This bio-energetics approach
complements other foraging models in predicting likely impacts of environmental
change on marine higher predators dependent on species-specific foraging ecologies.
Documents
503887:51393
N503887JA.pdf
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (705kB) | Preview
Information
Programmes:
CEH Science Areas 2013- > Ecological Processes & Resilience
CEH Programmes 2012 > Biodiversity
CEH Programmes 2012 > Biodiversity
Library
Statistics
Downloads per month over past year
Metrics
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Share
![]() |
