Rushton, A.W.A.; Molyneux, S.G.. 2011 Biostratigraphical divisions. In: Rushton, Adrian W A; Bruck, P.M.; Molyneux, Stewart; Williams, Mark; Woodcock, N.H., (eds.) A revised correlation of the Cambrian rocks in the British Isles / A.W.A. Rushton ... [et al]. London, UK, Geological Society of London, 6-12. (Geological Society Special Report, 25).
Abstract
Since the 19th century geologists working on Cambrian rocks world-wide have relied
largely on trilobites as biostratigraphical guides, and these remain important,
especially in Series 3 and the Furongian Series, where they enable refined
correlations. In Series 2, especially in its lower part where trilobite biostratigraphy
becomes increasingly difficult, other criteria are employed, for example the
distribution of small shelly fossils, bradoriid arthropods and, where available,
archaeocyaths. In Avalonia there are no archaeocyaths, but the bradoriids have been
revised and exploited stratigraphically (Siveter & Williams 1997, Williams & Siveter
1998). The recent development of acritarch biostratigraphy, which has made a vital
contribution, is discussed below. Towards the base of the Cambrian, body fossils may
be very scarce and trace fossils have been used biostratigraphically (Narbonne &
Myrow 1988; Bland & Goldring 1995; McIlroy & Horák 2006), though they may be
difficult to work with. All the zones referred to are biozones (Rawson et al. 2002),
most of those in the Terreneuvian and Series 2 and 3 being assemblage zones, whilst
those in the Furongian are local range-zones of selected species.
Information
Programmes:
UNSPECIFIED
Library
Statistics
Downloads per month over past year
Metrics
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
Share
![]() |
