Adaptive sampling by citizen scientists improves species distribution model performance: a simulation study

Mondain-Monval, Thomas ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2002; Pocock, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4375-0445; Rolph, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-9456; August, Tom ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-3385; Wright, Emma; Jarvis, Susan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5382-5135. 2024 Adaptive sampling by citizen scientists improves species distribution model performance: a simulation study. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 15 (7). 1206-1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14355

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N537516JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

1. Volunteer recorders generate large amounts of biodiversity data through citizen science which is used in conservation planning and policy decision-making. Unstructured sampling, where the volunteer can record what they want, where they want, leads to spatial unevenness in these data. While there are many statistical techniques to account for the resulting biases, it may be possible to improve datasets by directing a subset of recorders to sample in the most informative locations, known as adaptive sampling. We investigated the potential for adaptive sampling to improve the performance of species distribution models built on citizen science data using simulated ecological communities. 2. We simulated ecological assemblages across Great Britain based on current butterfly data and modelled the distributions of each species. We then simulated the sampling of new data based on five adaptive sampling methods (one empirical method based simply on gap-filling, and four model-based methods using various measures from the model outputs) and one non-adaptive method (a method in which recording continued in the current pattern), and re-ran the species distribution models. In these, we also varied the rate of recording effort that was distributed according to adaptive sampling. The model predictions using the original and adaptively sampled data were compared to true species distributions to evaluate the performance of each method. 3. We found that all adaptive sampling approaches improved model performance, with greatest improvement for model-based approaches compared to the empirical sampling method (i.e. simple gap-filling). All four model-based adaptive sampling approaches provided similar benefits for model outputs. Improvements in model performance were greatest when the amount of adaptive sampling changed from no uptake to 1% uptake, indicating that only a small amount of change in recorder behaviour is needed to improve model performance. 4. Directing volunteer recorders to places where records are most needed, based on information from model outputs, can improve species distribution models built on citizen science data, even with minimal uptake of suggested locations. Our results therefore suggest that adaptive sampling by recorders could be beneficial for real-world citizen science datasets.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14355
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-) Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	2041-210X
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	adaptive sampling, butterfly, citizen science, simulations, species distribution model
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment Data and Information
Related URLs:	Dataset Dataset
Date made live:	05 Jun 2024 12:20 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/537516

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...