The impact of ditch blocking on fluvial carbon export from a UK blanket bog

Evans, Christopher D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-354X; Peacock, Michael; Green, Sophie M.; Holden, Joseph; Chapman, Pippa J.; Lebron, Inma ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8610-9717; Callaghan, Nathan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0273-6161; Grayson, Richard; Baird, Andrew J.. 2018 The impact of ditch blocking on fluvial carbon export from a UK blanket bog. Hydrological Processes, 32 (13). 2141-2154. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13158

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N520306PP.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13158

Abstract/Summary

We investigated the effects of ditch‐blocking on fluvial carbon concentrations and fluxes at a five‐year, replicated, control‐intervention field experiment on a blanket peatland in North Wales, UK. The site was hydrologically instrumented, and runoff via open and blocked ditches was analysed for dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved carbon dioxide (CO2) and dissolved methane (CH4). DOC was also analysed in peat porewater and overland flow. The hillslope experiment was embedded within a paired control‐intervention catchment study, with three years of pre‐blocking and six years of post‐blocking data. Results from the hillslope showed large reductions in discharge via blocked ditches, with water partly redirected into hillslope surface and subsurface flows, and partly into remaining open ditches. We observed no impacts of ditch‐blocking on DOC, POC, dissolved CO2 or CH4 in ditch waters, DOC in porewaters or overland flow, or stream water DOC at the paired catchment scale. Similar DOC concentrations in ditch water, overland flow and porewater suggest that diverting flow from the ditch network to surface or subsurface flow had a limited impact on concentrations or fluxes of DOC entering the stream network. The subdued response of fluvial carbon to ditch‐blocking in our study may be attributable to the relatively low susceptibility of blanket peatlands to drainage, or to physical alterations of the peat since drainage. We conclude that ditch‐blocking cannot be always be expected to deliver reductions in fluvial carbon loss, or improvements in the quality of drinking water supplies.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13158
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0885-6087
Additional Keywords:	blanket bog, dissolved orgainc carbon, fluvial carbon, peatland, re-wetting
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	18 Jun 2018 15:21 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/520306

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13158

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)

ISSN:

0885-6087

Additional Keywords:

blanket bog, dissolved orgainc carbon, fluvial carbon, peatland, re-wetting

NORA Subject Terms:

Ecology and Environment