Understanding potential sources of bias and error in the biometric sexing of birds

Broughton, Richard K. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628; Clark, Jacquie A.. 2018 Understanding potential sources of bias and error in the biometric sexing of birds. Ringing & Migration, 32 (2). 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2017.1438367

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N519325PP.pdf - Accepted Version Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Biometrics, particularly wing length, are commonly used to assign the sex of many birds in species where the plumage is similar for males and females. Virtually all species show some measurement overlap between the sexes, however, and measurement error can add further uncertainty into data sets. This can result in individuals being misclassified as the wrong sex and introducing bias into subsequent analyses, particularly if the life histories of misclassified birds differ from those of others. We used the Marsh Tit Poecile palustris as a case study to examine potential sources of error and bias when assigning sex based on wing length. There was no evidence for a heritability of wing lengths that could result in localised populations of atypical size via a ‘founder effect’, which would otherwise undermine biometric sexing. Additionally, potentially misclassified birds did not differ from others in how long they persisted in the local population, so avoiding any potential bias of misclassification in demographic analyses. Compared to Marsh Tit data collected during intensive studies, the national data set pooled from contributors across Britain showed much greater variation in wing lengths, resulting from wider variation in the accuracy of measurement and recording. This variation in pooled data can have implications for analyses, and we discuss the importance of data quality in ringing schemes.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2017.1438367
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0307-8698
Additional Keywords:	founder effect, human error, life history, marsh tit, ringing
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	06 Mar 2018 12:09 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/519325

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...