nerc.ac.uk

An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota

Beresford,, Nicholas A.; Balonov, Mikhail; Beaugelin-Seiller, Karine; Brown, Justin; Copplestone, David; Hingston, Joanne L.; Horyna, Jan; Hosseini, Ali; Howard, Brenda J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9524; Kamboj, Sunita; Nedveckaite, Tatjana; Olyslaegers, Geert; Sazykina, Tatiana; Vives i Batlle, Jordi; Yankovich, Tamara L; Yu, Charley. 2008 An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 66 (11). 1745-1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.04.009

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract/Summary

Over the last decade a number of models and approaches have been developed for the estimation of the exposure of non-human biota to ionising radiations. In some countries these are now being used in regulatory assessments. However, to date there has been no attempt to compare the outputs of the different models used. This paper presents the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency's EMRAS Biota Working Group which compares the predictions of a number of such models in model–model and model–data inter-comparisons.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.04.009
Programmes: CEH Programmes pre-2009 publications > Biogeochemistry > SE01B Sustainable Monitoring, Risk Assessment and Management of Chemicals > SE01.4 Monitoring and predicting the distribution of chemicals in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: Shore
ISSN: 0969-8043
Additional Keywords: Non-human biota, Radiological protection, Model, radioecology
NORA Subject Terms: Ecology and Environment
Data and Information
Date made live: 11 Dec 2008 14:30 +0 (UTC)
URI: https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/5140

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...