Benchmarking the seasonal cycle of CO2 fluxes simulated by terrestrial ecosystem models

Peng, Shushi; Ciais, Philippe; Chevallier, Frédéric; Peylin, Philippe; Cadule, Patricia; Sitch, Stephen; Piao, Shilong; Ahlström, Anders; Huntingford, Chris ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-7770; Levy, Peter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-1901; Li, Xiran; Liu, Yongwen; Lomas, Mark; Poulter, Benjamin; Viovy, Nicolas; Wang, Tao; Wang, Xuhui; Zaehle, Sönke; Zeng, Ning; Zhao, Fang; Zhao, Hongfang. 2015 Benchmarking the seasonal cycle of CO2 fluxes simulated by terrestrial ecosystem models. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 29 (1). 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004931

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text ©2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved. N512899JA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

We evaluated the seasonality of CO2 fluxes simulated by nine terrestrial ecosystem models of the TRENDY project against (1) the seasonal cycle of gross primary production (GPP) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) measured at flux tower sites over different biomes, (2) gridded monthly Model Tree Ensembles-estimated GPP (MTE-GPP) and MTE-NEE obtained by interpolating many flux tower measurements with a machine-learning algorithm, (3) atmospheric CO2 mole fraction measurements at surface sites, and (4) CO2 total columns (XCO2) measurements from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). For comparison with atmospheric CO2 measurements, the LMDZ4 transport model was run with time-varying CO2 fluxes of each model as surface boundary conditions. Seven out of the nine models overestimate the seasonal amplitude of GPP and produce a too early start in spring at most flux sites. Despite their positive bias for GPP, the nine models underestimate NEE at most flux sites and in the Northern Hemisphere compared with MTE-NEE. Comparison with surface atmospheric CO2 measurements confirms that most models underestimate the seasonal amplitude of NEE in the Northern Hemisphere (except CLM4C and SDGVM). Comparison with TCCON data also shows that the seasonal amplitude of XCO2 is underestimated by more than 10% for seven out of the nine models (except for CLM4C and SDGVM) and that the MTE-NEE product is closer to the TCCON data using LMDZ4. From CO2 columns measured routinely at 10 TCCON sites, the constrained amplitude of NEE over the Northern Hemisphere is of 1.6 ± 0.4 gC m−2 d−1, which translates into a net CO2 uptake during the carbon uptake period in the Northern Hemisphere of 7.9 ± 2.0 PgC yr−1.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004931
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Dise Reynard
ISSN:	0886-6236
Additional Keywords:	carbon cycle, GPP, NEE, seasonal cycle, CO2, TCCON
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment Atmospheric Sciences
Date made live:	08 Feb 2016 16:37 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/512899

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...