nerc.ac.uk

What are the costs and benefits of using aerial photography to survey habitats in 1km squares?

Wood, C.M.; Norton, L.R.; Rowland, C.S.. 2015 What are the costs and benefits of using aerial photography to survey habitats in 1km squares? Lancaster, UK, NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, 23pp. (CEH Project no. C04867) (Unpublished)

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
[img] Text
CS_AP_Report_Final170215.pdf
Restricted to NERC registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
Text
CS_AP_Report_Final170215_no_maps.pdf

Download (985kB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Undertaking a field survey, such as the Countryside Survey (Carey et al., 2008) or the Welsh Glastir Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (GMEP) (Emmett and GMEP team, 2014), is a relatively expensive and time consuming way of collecting habitat data in comparison with remotely sensed techniques. In order to assess the information gained from a field survey in relation to the information that can be gained from aerial photography, a short project has been undertaken with the following objectives: • To measure the time taken to survey a 1km square using aerial photography (for a range of different and UK representative landscape types) • To measure the accuracy and level of detail of data derived using this method relative to data collected using field survey • To provide an idea of time costs associated with each of the methods • To determine the extent to which Priority Habitats can be assessed using remotely sensed methods in addition to Broad Habitats.

Item Type: Publication - Report (UNSPECIFIED)
CEH Sections: Parr
Funders/Sponsors: NERC
Additional Keywords: survey, aerial photography
NORA Subject Terms: Ecology and Environment
Related URLs:
Date made live: 21 Oct 2015 12:45 +0 (UTC)
URI: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/511330

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...