nerc.ac.uk

The impact of sequencing depth on the inferred taxonomic composition and AMR gene content of metagenomic samples

Gweon, H. Soon; Shaw, Liam P.; Swann, Jeremy; De Maio, Nicola; AbuOun, Manal; Niehus, Rene; Hubbard, Alasdair T.M.; Bowes, Mike J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0673-1934; Bailey, Mark J.; Peto, Tim E.A.; Hoosdally, Sarah J.; Walker, A. Sarah; Sebra, Robert P.; Crook, Derrick W.; Anjum, Muna F.; Read, Daniel S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-5154; Stoesser, Nicole. 2019 The impact of sequencing depth on the inferred taxonomic composition and AMR gene content of metagenomic samples. Environmental Microbiome, 14, 7. 15, pp. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-019-0347-1

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
[img]
Preview
Text
N525752JA.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Background: Shotgun metagenomics is increasingly used to characterise microbial communities, particularly for the investigation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in different animal and environmental contexts. There are many different approaches for inferring the taxonomic composition and AMR gene content of complex community samples from shotgun metagenomic data, but there has been little work establishing the optimum sequencing depth, data processing and analysis methods for these samples. In this study we used shotgun metagenomics and sequencing of cultured isolates from the same samples to address these issues. We sampled three potential environmental AMR gene reservoirs (pig caeca, river sediment, effluent) and sequenced samples with shotgun metagenomics at high depth (~ 200 million reads per sample). Alongside this, we cultured single-colony isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from the same samples and used hybrid sequencing (short- and long-reads) to create high-quality assemblies for comparison to the metagenomic data. To automate data processing, we developed an open-source software pipeline, ‘ResPipe’. Results: Taxonomic profiling was much more stable to sequencing depth than AMR gene content. 1 million reads per sample was sufficient to achieve < 1% dissimilarity to the full taxonomic composition. However, at least 80 million reads per sample were required to recover the full richness of different AMR gene families present in the sample, and additional allelic diversity of AMR genes was still being discovered in effluent at 200 million reads per sample. Normalising the number of reads mapping to AMR genes using gene length and an exogenous spike of Thermus thermophilus DNA substantially changed the estimated gene abundance distributions. While the majority of genomic content from cultured isolates from effluent was recoverable using shotgun metagenomics, this was not the case for pig caeca or river sediment. Conclusions: Sequencing depth and profiling method can critically affect the profiling of polymicrobial animal and environmental samples with shotgun metagenomics. Both sequencing of cultured isolates and shotgun metagenomics can recover substantial diversity that is not identified using the other methods. Particular consideration is required when inferring AMR gene content or presence by mapping metagenomic reads to a database. ResPipe, the open-source software pipeline we have developed, is freely available (https://gitlab.com/hsgweon/ResPipe).

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-019-0347-1
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)
Water Resources (Science Area 2017-)
Directors, SCs
UKCEH Fellows
ISSN: 2524-6372
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.: Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords: antimicrobial resistance (AMR), one health, metagenomics, Enterobacteriaceae
NORA Subject Terms: Health
Biology and Microbiology
Date made live: 04 Nov 2019 17:19 +0 (UTC)
URI: https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/525752

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...