Discussion of the reply by R.L. Romer and U. Kroner on “Geochemical signature of Ordovician Mn-rich sedimentary rocks on the Avalonian shelf"

Schofield, David I.; Waldron, John W.F.; White, Chris E.; Barr, Sandra M.. 2012 Discussion of the reply by R.L. Romer and U. Kroner on “Geochemical signature of Ordovician Mn-rich sedimentary rocks on the Avalonian shelf". Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49 (11). 1372-1377. https://doi.org/10.1139/e2012-049

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract/Summary

In their article ‘Reply to the discussion by J.W.F. Waldron and C.E. White on “Geochemical signature of Ordovician Mn-rich sedimentary rocks on the Avalonian shelf”’, R.L. Romer and U. Kroner reinterpret geochronological data presented by J.W.F. Waldron, D.I. Schofield, C.E. White, and S.M. Barr to imply an Ordovician, not a Cambrian, depositional age for the succession of the Harlech Dome, North Wales, and Meguma Supergroup, Nova Scotia. However, an extensive history of biostratigraphic and geological survey data refutes this interpretation and shows that the rocks are unequivocally Cambrian. Waldron et al. used the U–Pb zircon laser-ablation – multicollector – inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry technique primarily to provide information on sediment provenance and not depositional age. Investigation of anomalously young 206Pb/238U ages showed evidence of Pb loss. These data provide little constraint on depositional age and cannot be used to infer that the Harlech Grits Group is Ordovician.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1139/e2012-049
Programmes:	BGS Programmes 2010 > Geology and Landscape (Wales)
ISSN:	0008-4077
Date made live:	18 Mar 2013 15:08 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/500506

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...