A threshold in submarine channel curvature explains erosion rate and type

Zulkifli, Zaki; Clare, Michael A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-3878; Heijnen, Maarten; Lintern, D．Gwyn; Stacey, Cooper; Talling, Peter J.; Cartigny, Matthieu J.B.; Minshull, Timothy A.; Moreno, Hector Marin; Peakall, Jeffrey; Darby, Stephen. 2024 A threshold in submarine channel curvature explains erosion rate and type. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 646, 118953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118953

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
1-s2.0-S0012821X24003868-main.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (10MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118953

Abstract/Summary

Submarine channels are conduits for sediment-laden flows called turbidity currents, which play a globally significant role in the offshore transport of sediment and organic carbon and pose a hazard to critical seafloor infrastructure. Time-lapse repeat surveys of active submarine channels have recently shown that upstream-migrating knickpoints can dominate channel evolution. This finding contrasts with many studies of ancient outcrops and subsurface geophysical data that inferred channel bends migrate laterally, as occurs in meandering rivers. Here, we aim to test these two contrasting views by analysing two high-resolution repeat seafloor surveys acquired 13 years apart across the entirety of an active submarine channel in Knight Inlet, British Columbia. We find that two main mechanisms control channel evolution, with the normalised channel radius of curvature (specifically, R* - channel radius of curvature normalised to channel width) explaining which of these mechanisms dominate. Pronounced outer bend migration only occurs at tight bends (R*<1.5). In contrast, at broader bends and straighter sections (R*>1.5), erosion is focused within the channel axis, where upstream-migrating knickpoints dominate. High centrifugal accelerations at tight bends promote super-elevation of flows on the outer channel flank, thus, enhancing outer bend erosion. At R*>1.5, flow is focused within the channel axis, promoting knickpoints that migrate upstream at an order of magnitude faster than the rate of outer bend erosion at tight bends. Despite the dominance of knickpoints in eroding the channel axis, their stratigraphic preservation is very low. In contrast, the lateral migration of channel bends results in much higher preservation via lateral accretion of deposits on the inner bend. We conclude that multiple mechanisms can control evolution at different channel reaches and that the role of knickpoints has been underestimated from past studies that focused on deposits due to their low preservation potential.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118953
ISSN:	0012821X
Additional Keywords:	Submarine channel evolution, knickpoint migration, Outer bend erosion, Channel meander
Date made live:	05 Sep 2024 15:13 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/537969

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118953

ISSN:

0012821X

Additional Keywords:

Submarine channel evolution, knickpoint migration, Outer bend erosion, Channel meander

Date made live:

05 Sep 2024 15:13 +0 (UTC)

URI:

https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/537969