Phenological overlap between crop and pollinators: contrasting influence of native and non-native bees on raspberry fruits over the flowering season

Sáez, Agustín; Garibaldi, Lucas A.; Aizen, Marcelo A.; Morales, Carolina L.; Traveset, Anna; de Groot, Grecia S.; Schmucki, Reto ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3064-7553. 2023 Phenological overlap between crop and pollinators: contrasting influence of native and non-native bees on raspberry fruits over the flowering season. Journal of Applied Ecology, 60 (12). 2540-2549. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14519

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N536175JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (597kB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

•1. Phenological overlap between crop flowering and pollinators is a crucial trait for the pollination of more than 75% of the world's crops. However, crop management rarely considers the seasonal aspect of plant–pollinator mutualism. Here, we investigate the phenological overlap between crops and pollinators and how it affects pollination and fruit production. •2. We measured the abundance and richness of native and non-native pollinators visiting raspberry flowers at two different times during the flowering season (i.e. early and late flowering periods) and examined their effects on crop yield in 16 fields. •3. The community of pollinators foraging on raspberry flowers was more diverse and dominated by native pollinators during the early flowering period when most native plant species were flowering. Later in the season, when native flower resources declined in the surrounding environment, raspberry flowers were visited mainly by two non-native bees: managed honeybees and the invasive bumblebee Bombus terrestris. •4. Pollinator contribution to raspberry yield was twice as high in the early flowering period compared to the late period (61% vs. 31% increase in drupelet set respectively). Flower damage caused by extremely high visitation frequencies by non-native bees in the late period was six times higher than in the early flowering period (30% vs. 5% of damaged flowers respectively). •5. Synthesis and applications. Providing sufficient pollen and nectar resources to support wild pollinators over extended periods in agricultural landscapes can contribute to crop pollination and ensure high fruit weight and quality. This can be achieved by restoring natural and semi-natural areas near crop fields with native, long-flowering plant species. Growers and crop breeding programmes should consider selecting flowering times that coincide with periods of high diversity or abundance of native pollinators to reduce dependence on managed pollinators.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14519
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0021-8901
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	crop flowering, crop pollination, ecosystem services, flower resources, managed pollinators, native pollinators, pollinator activity
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment Agriculture and Soil Science
Related URLs:	Dataset
Date made live:	10 Nov 2023 09:50 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/536175

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...