nerc.ac.uk

A ‘Limitations’ section should be mandatory in all scientific papers

Sumpter, John P.; Runnalls, Tamsin J.; Johnson, Andrew C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-3764; Barcelo, Damia. 2023 A ‘Limitations’ section should be mandatory in all scientific papers. Science of the Total Environment, 857 (2), 159395. 4, pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159395

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract/Summary

It is unusual, and can be difficult, for scientists to reflect in their publications on any limitations their research had. This is a consequence of the extreme pressure that scientists are under to ‘publish or perish’. The inevitable consequence is that much published research is not as good as it could, and should, be, leading to the current ‘reproducibility crisis’. Approaches to address this crisis are required. Our suggestion is to include a ‘Limitations’ section in all scientific papers. Evidence is provided showing that such a section must be mandatory. Adding a ‘Limitations’ section to scientific papers would greatly increase honesty, openness and transparency, to the considerable benefit of both the scientific community and society in general. This suggestion is applicable to all scientific disciplines. Finally, we apologise if our suggestion has already been made by others.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159395
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: Pollution (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN: 0048-9697
Additional Keywords: reproducibility crisis, quality of research, limitations, openness, transparency
Date made live: 30 Dec 2022 12:53 +0 (UTC)
URI: https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/533776

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...