Renewing and improving the environmental risk assessment of chemicals

Sumpter, John P.; Johnson, Andrew C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-3764; Runnalls, Tamsin J.. 2022 Renewing and improving the environmental risk assessment of chemicals. Science of the Total Environment, 845, 157256. 7, pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157256

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N532958JA.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (525kB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157256

Abstract/Summary

The processes underpinning the environmental risk assessment (ERA) of chemicals have not changed appreciably in the last 30 years. It is unclear how successful these processes are in protecting the environment from any adverse effects of chemicals. To ascertain if the current methodology can be improved, and if so, how, we invited experts to suggest how the current ERA process could be improved. They were not asked to select from a list of suggestions. The 36 experts made 109 suggestions for improvement, which could be grouped into 33 categories. The category that received the most support, from 12 experts, was to utilise a broader range of scientific information, including all up-to-date information, in ERAs. The second most popular category, supported by 10 experts, was the suggestion to regulate mixtures of chemicals; the current regulatory process involves chemical-by-chemical assessment. Two quite radical proposals were suggested. One was to replace the regulator with artificial intelligence. The other was to establish a new competent authority that would appoint groups of experts, each including representatives of the range of stakeholders, to decide which studies were required, commission those studies, then conduct the ERA based on the results of those studies. These two radical proposals, which the authors support strongly, are not necessarily mutually exclusive. We conclude that the present ERA process could be improved to better protect the environment from the myriad of chemicals in use.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157256
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Pollution (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0048-9697
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	environmental risk assessment, suggestions for improvement, up-to-date scientific knowledge, mixtures, radical new ERA process
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	20 Jul 2022 12:04 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/532958

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157256

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Pollution (Science Area 2017-)

ISSN:

0048-9697

Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:

Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.

Additional Keywords:

environmental risk assessment, suggestions for improvement, up-to-date scientific knowledge, mixtures, radical new ERA process