Conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe: looking to the future by learning from the past

Lécuyer, L.; Alard, D.; Calla, S.; Coolsaet, B.; Fickel, T.; Heinsoo, K.; Henle, K.; Herzon, I.; Hodgson, I.; Quétier, F.; McCracken, D.; McMahon, B.J.; Melts, I.; Sands, D.; Skrimizea, E.; Watt, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-728X; White, R.; Young, Juliette. 2021 Conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe: looking to the future by learning from the past. Advances in Ecological Research, 65. 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2021.10.005

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Text N532467PP.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to NORA staff only until November 2024. Download (746kB)

Abstract/Summary

Conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe are increasing, due to multiple demands from agricultural ecosystems, including a growing need for high quality and good-value agricultural products, as well as the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Currents trends such as globalization, European policies, and global change, such as climate change and nitrogen atmospheric deposition are potentially driving the emergence or evolution of biodiversity conflicts in Europe. These trends are interwoven with continuing debates around land-sparing and land-sharing, that often lead to conflicting perspectives and social dynamics that influence how local actors interact with each other over agriculture. Whilst some strategies have been put in place to address the potential competition between agriculture and biodiversity, such as reglementary and market-based mechanisms, and non-monetary voluntary approaches, these need to be reflected upon and improved for a future agriculture where the negative impacts of conflicts are minimized. This paper provides a comprehensive update on the current and future trends and evaluates current strategies, to highlight the importance of addressing conflict not only through technical fixes but by developing approaches that involve profound changes in agricultural systems and a shift in how people collaborate, perceive conflict and address it. We propose three emerging pathways—agroecology, a shift to partnerships, and conflict transformation—that would support a positive change for the future of biodiversity conflicts in agriculture.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2021.10.005
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	UKCEH Fellows
ISSN:	0065-2504
Additional Keywords:	conflict, biodiversity, agriculture, Europe, partnerships, agroecology, conflict transformation
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	11 Apr 2022 10:55 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/532467

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...