Relationships between riverine and terrestrial dissolved organic carbon: concentration, radiocarbon signature, specific UV absorbance

Tipping, Edward ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-6512; Elias, Jessica L.; Keenan, Patrick O.; Helliwell, Rachel C.; Pedentchouk, Nikolai; Cooper, Richard J.; Buckingham, Sarah; Gjessing, Egil; Ascough, Philippa; Bryant, Charlotte L.; Garnett, Mark H.. 2022 Relationships between riverine and terrestrial dissolved organic carbon: concentration, radiocarbon signature, specific UV absorbance. Science of the Total Environment, 817, 153000. 12, pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153000

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N532297JA.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153000

Abstract/Summary

The transfer of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from land to watercourses plays a major role in the carbon cycle, and in the transport and fate of associated organic and inorganic contaminants. We investigated, at global scale, how the concentrations and properties of riverine DOC depend upon combinations of terrestrial source solutions. For topsoil, subsoil, groundwater and river solutions in different Köppen-Geiger climatic zones, we compiled published and new values of DOC concentration ([DOC]), radiocarbon signature (DO14C), and specific UV absorbance (SUVA). The average value of each DOC variable decreased significantly in magnitude from topsoil to subsoil to groundwater, permitting the terrestrial sources to be distinguished. We used the terrestrial data to simulate the riverine distributions of each variable, and also relationships between pairs of variables. To achieve good matches between observed and simulated data, it was necessary to optimise the distributions of water fractions contributed by each of the three terrestrial sources, and also to reduce the mean input terrestrial [DOC] values, to about 60% of the measured ones. One possible explanation for the required lowering of the modelled terrestrial [DOC] values might be unrepresentative sampling of terrestrial DOC, including dilution effects; another is the loss of DOC during riverine transport. High variations in simulated riverine DOC variables, which match observed data, are due predominantly to variations in source solution values, with a lesser contribution from the different combinations of source waters. On average, most DOC in rivers draining catchments with forest and/or grass-shrub land cover comes in similar amounts from topsoil and subsoil, with about 10% from groundwater. In rivers draining croplands, subsoil and groundwater solutions are the likely dominant DOC sources, while in wetland rivers most DOC is from topsoil.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153000
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Pollution (Science Area 2017-) UKCEH Fellows
ISSN:	0048-9697
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	dissolved organic carbon, groundwater, radiocarbon, rivers, soil, specific UV absorbance
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment Hydrology
Date made live:	22 Mar 2022 16:35 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/532297

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153000

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Pollution (Science Area 2017-)
UKCEH Fellows

ISSN:

0048-9697

Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:

Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.

Additional Keywords:

dissolved organic carbon, groundwater, radiocarbon, rivers, soil, specific UV absorbance