Potential co‐benefits and trade‐offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri‐food productivity

McGuire, Ryan; Williams, Paul N.; Smith, Pete; McGrath, Steve P.; Curry, Donald; Donnison, Iain; Emmett, Bridget ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-4389; Scollan, Nigel. 2022 Potential co‐benefits and trade‐offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri‐food productivity. Food and Energy Security, 11 (2), e352. 10, pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.352

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text
N532255JA.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.352

Abstract/Summary

Maximising resource-use efficiency, productivity and environmental sustainability are all fundamental requirements to raise global food production by ~70 per cent in order to feed a world population of ~9.7 billion people by 2050. Perhaps the most vital resource within our capacity to achieve this goal is our soil. Broadly, the fundamental question concerns whether or not satisfying this production demand will accelerate soil degradation, climate change, and the loss of soil carbon stocks. This paper builds upon the outputs of the UK Charity ‘Food & Farming Futures’ (chaired by Lord Curry of Kirkharle) virtual workshop held on 23 March 2021, entitled ‘Capturing the Potential of Soil’. The event focussed on the link between soil health, primarily soil organic carbon (SOC), and agricultural productivity. Supported with commentaries by Professor Pete Smith (University of Aberdeen and Science Director of the Scottish Climate Change Centre of Expertise) and Professor Steve McGrath (Head of Sustainable Agricultural Sciences at Rothamsted Research), specific focus will be given to the research challenges within the UK’s ability to improve soil health and functionality, the implementation priorities that must be held in order to improve soil management by 2050 and what the potential co-benefits could be. These co-benefits were scattered across environmental, economic, social and political issues, yet they may be summarised into six primary co-benefits: developing natural capital, climate change mitigation, carbon trading, improvements in crop yield, animal performance and human health (nutrition). Additionally, the main barriers to improved soil management practices are centred on knowledge exchange-regarding agri-environmental techniques—whilst the most impactful solutions rely on soil monitoring, reporting and verification.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.352
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	2048-3694
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	agriculture, climate change, environment, food security, soil management, sustainability
NORA Subject Terms:	Agriculture and Soil Science
Date made live:	14 Mar 2022 17:36 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/532255

Item Type:

Publication - Article

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.352

UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:

Soils and Land Use (Science Area 2017-)

ISSN:

2048-3694

Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:

Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.

Additional Keywords:

agriculture, climate change, environment, food security, soil management, sustainability