Applying ground gas and gas flux monitoring techniques to low-enthalpy, shallow geothermal energy exploration

Smith, Douglas; Taylor-Curran, Helen; Barkwith, Andrew; Lister, Thomas R.; Kirk, Karen; Hannis, Sarah; Shorter, Kirsty; Walker-Verkuil, Kyle. 2021 Applying ground gas and gas flux monitoring techniques to low-enthalpy, shallow geothermal energy exploration. Geothermics, 97, 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102251

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text Tracked changes_Gas monitoring techniques.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (7MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Ground gas and gas flux testing has been undertaken in a variety of situations including detecting volcanic and geothermal activity and monitoring landfill and carbon storage. However, there are no documented studies of its application to shallow geothermal investigations, particularly where the water in disused mines will be used as the conduit for heat and the overlying ground has a complex industrial heritage. Background ground gas and gas flux measurements from three separate campaigns at a mine water heat research site in Glasgow, UK did not reveal any concerns regarding mine gas or other potentially harmful gases from previous land uses. The detected CO2 was found to be predominantly of biological origin and reflected the expected quantities based upon land use, seasonal and weather fluctuations and was consistent with other UK sites. One location is recommended for further investigation due to higher-than-expected nitrogen and lower oxygen measurements. Some hydrogen gas was detected, albeit well below explosive limits, which may be present as a result of past industrial site uses, highlighting the need for more investigation into the presence of hydrogen at ex-industrial sites. Apart from this there was very little evidence of the industrial site history in the gas characterisation. A process-based analysis, based upon the stoichiometric relationship of CO2, CH4, O2 and N2, was applied to the results. This complemented, but was not a substitute for, the background survey. There were limitations with the process-based approach when there was not a clear anomalous CO2 signal or where potentially more than one process was occurring simultaneously.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102251
ISSN:	03756505
Date made live:	13 Jan 2022 13:57 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/531758

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...