The weight‐of‐evidence approach and the need for greater international acceptance of its use in tackling questions of chemical harm to the environment

Johnson, Andrew C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-3764; Sumpter, John P.; Depledge, Michael H.. 2021 The weight‐of‐evidence approach and the need for greater international acceptance of its use in tackling questions of chemical harm to the environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 40 (11). 2968-2977. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5184

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N531315JA.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (429kB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

As we attempt to manage chemicals in the environment we need to be sure that our research efforts are being directed at the substances of greatest threat. All too often we focus on a chemical of concern and then cast around for evidence of its effects in an unstructured way. Risk assessment based on laboratory ecotoxicity studies, combined with field chemical measurements, can only take us so far. Uncertainty about the range and sufficiency of evidence required to take restorative action often puts policymakers in a difficult situation. We review this conundrum and reflect on how the “Hill criteria,” used widely by epidemiologists, have been applied to a weight-of-evidence approach (a term sometimes used interchangeably with ecoepidemiology) to build a case for causation. While using a set of such criteria to address sites of local environmental distress has been embraced by the US Environmental Protection Agency, we urge a wider adoption of weight-of-evidence approaches by policymakers, regulators, and scientists worldwide. A simplified series of criteria is offered. Progress will require a sustained commitment to long-term wildlife and chemical monitoring over a sufficient geographic spread. Development of a comprehensive monitoring network, coupled with assembling evidence of harm in a structured manner, should be the foundation for protecting our ecosystems and human health. This will enable us to not only judge the success or failure of our efforts but also diagnose underlying causes.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5184
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Pollution (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	0730-7268
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.:	Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords:	weight of evidence, chemicals, environment, populations, risk
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	27 Oct 2021 09:40 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/531315

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...