Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: using penguins as biological samplers

Fragão, Joana; Bessa, Filipa; Otero, Vanessa; Barbosa, Andrés; Sobral, Paula; Waluda, Claire M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3517-5233; Guímaro, Hugo R.; Xavier, José C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-6660. 2021 Microplastics and other anthropogenic particles in Antarctica: using penguins as biological samplers. Science of The Total Environment, 788, 147698. 11, pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract/Summary

Microplastics (< 5mm in size) is known to be widespread in the marine environment, but it is still poorly studied in Polar Regions, particularly in the Antarctic. As penguins have a wide distribution around Antarctica, three congeneric species, Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae), chinstrap (Pygoscelis antarcticus) and gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) were selected to evaluate the occurrence of microplastics across the Antarctic Peninsula and Scotia Sea. Scat samples (used as a proxy of ingestion), were collected in the breeding colonies over seven seasons between 2006 and 2016. Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), present in scat samples, contributed 85%, 66% and 54% of the diet in terms of frequency of occurrence to the diet of Adélie, gentoo and chinstrap penguins, respectively. Microplastics were found in 15%, 28% and 29% scats of Adélie, chinstrap and gentoo penguin respectively. A total of 92 particles were extracted from the scats (n=317) and 32% (n=29) were chemically identified via micro-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (μ-FTIR). From all the particles extracted, 35% were identified as microplastics, in particular, polyethylene (80%) and polyester (10%), while 10% was not possible to ascertain their identification. Other anthropogenic particles were identified in 55% of samples (cellulose fibres), identified as fibres of cellulose. The results show a similar frequency of occurrence of particles across all colonies, suggesting there is no particular point source for microplastic pollution in the Scotia Sea. Additionally, no clear temporal variation in the number of microplastics in penguins was observed. Overall, this study reveals the presence of microplastics across Antarctica, in three penguin species and offers evidence of other anthropogenic particles in high numbers. Further research is needed to better understand microplastics spatio-temporal dynamics, fate and effect on these ecosystems, and improve plastic pollution policies in Antarctica.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147698
ISSN:	00489697
Additional Keywords:	Antarctic Peninsula, Scotia Sea, Plastic pollution, Microplastics, Cellulose, Antarctic top predators
Date made live:	18 May 2021 10:58 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530310

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...