Data quality influences the predicted distribution and habitat of four southern-hemisphere albatross species

Goetz, Kimberly T.; Stephenson, Fabrice; Hoskins, Andrew; Bindoff, Aidan D.; Orben, Rachael A.; Sagar, Paul M.; Torres, Leigh G.; Kroeger, Caitlin E.; Sztukowski, Lisa A.; Phillips, Richard A.; Votier, Stephen C.; Bearhop, Stuart; Taylor, Graeme A.; Thompson, David R.. 2022 Data quality influences the predicted distribution and habitat of four southern-hemisphere albatross species. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, 782923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.782923

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text (Open Access) © 2022 Goetz, Stephenson, Hoskins, Bindoff, Orben, Sagar, Torres, Kroeger, Sztukowski, Phillips, Votier, Bearhop, Taylor and Thompson. fmars-09-782923.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (21MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Few studies have assessed the influence of data quality on the predicted probability of occurrence and preferred habitat of marine predators. We compared results from four species distribution models (SDMs) for four southern-hemisphere albatross species, Buller’s (Thalassarche bulleri), Campbell (T. impavida), grey-headed (T. chrysostoma), and white-capped (T. steadi), based on datasets of differing quality, ranging from no location data to twice-daily locations of individual birds collected by geolocation devices. Two relative environmental suitability (RES) models were fit using minimum and maximum preferred and absolute values for each environmental variable based on (1) monthly 50% kernel density contours and background environmental data, and (2) primary literature or expert opinion. Additionally, two boosted regression tree (BRT) models were fit using (1) opportunistic sightings data, and (2) geolocation data from bird-borne electronic tags. Using model-specific threshold values, habitat was quantified for each species and model. Model variables included distance from land, bathymetry, sea surface temperature, and chlorophyll-a concentration. Results from both RES models and the BRT model fit with opportunistic sightings were compared to those from the BRT model fit using geolocation data to assess the influence of data quality on predicted occupancy and habitat. For all species, BRT models outperformed RES models. BRT models offer a predictive advantage over RES models by being able to identify relevant variables, incorporate environmental interactions, and provide spatially explicit estimates of model uncertainty. RES models resulted in larger, less refined areas of predicted habitat for all species. Our study highlights the importance of data quality in predicting the distribution and habitat of albatrosses and emphasises the need to consider the pros and cons associated with different levels of data quality when using SDMs to inform management decisions. Furthermore, we examine the overlap in preferred habitat predicted by each SDM with fishing effort. We discuss the influence of data quality on predicting the wide-scale distributions of pelagic seabirds and how these impacts could result in different protection measures.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.782923
Additional Keywords:	albatross, species distribution models, relative environmental suitability, boosted regression tree, habitat suitability, geolocation
Date made live:	18 May 2022 08:28 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/530004

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...