Understanding water and energy fluxes in the Amazonia: lessons from an observation‐model intercomparison

Restrepo‐Coupe, Natalia; Albert, Loren P.; Longo, Marcos; Baker, Ian; Levine, Naomi M.; Mercado, Lina M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4069-0838; da Araujo, Alessandro C.; Christoffersen, Bradley O'Donnell; Costa, Marcos H.; Fitzjarrald, David R.; Galbraith, David; Imbuzeiro, Hewlley; Malhi, Yadvinder; von Randow, Celso; Zeng, Xubin; Moorcroft, Paul; Saleska, Scott R.. 2021 Understanding water and energy fluxes in the Amazonia: lessons from an observation‐model intercomparison. Global Change Biology, 27 (9). 1802-1819. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15555

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.

Preview

Text N529790PP.pdf - Accepted Version Download (9MB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Tropical forests are an important part of global water and energy cycles, but the mechanisms that drive seasonality of their land‐atmosphere exchanges have proven challenging to capture in models. Here, we (1) report the seasonality of fluxes of latent heat (LE), sensible heat (H), and outgoing short and longwave radiation at four diverse tropical forest sites across Amazonia ‐‐ along the equator from the Caxiuanã and Tapajós National Forests in the eastern Amazon to a forest near Manaus, and from the equatorial zone to the southern forest in Reserva Jaru; (2) investigate how vegetation and climate influence these fluxes; and (3) evaluate land surface model (LSM) performance by comparing simulations to observations. We found that previously identified failure of models to capture observed dry‐season increases in evapotranspiration was associated with model over‐estimations of (1) magnitude and seasonality of Bowen ratios (relative to aseasonal observations in which sensible was only 20‐30% of the latent heat flux) indicating model exaggerated water limitation, (2) canopy emissivity and reflectance (albedo was only 10 to 15% of incoming solar radiation, compared to 0.15‐0.22% simulated), and (3) vegetation temperatures (due to underestimation of dry‐season evapotranspiration and associated cooling). These partially compensating model‐observation discrepancies (e.g. higher temperatures expected from excess Bowen ratios were partially ameliorated by brighter leaves and more interception/evaporation) significantly biased seasonal model estimates of net radiation (Rn), the key driver of water and energy fluxes (LE ~ 0.6Rn and H ~ 0.15Rn). Though these biases varied among sites and models. A better representation of energy‐related parameters associated with dynamic phenology (e.g. leaf optical properties, canopy interception, and skin temperature) could improve simulations and benchmarking of current vegetation‐atmosphere exchange and reduce uncertainty of regional and global biogeochemical models.

Item Type:	Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15555
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas:	Hydro-climate Risks (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN:	1354-1013
Additional Keywords:	evapotranspiration, energy balance, eddy covariance flux seasonality, Amazonia, tropical forests, land surface models, ecosystem-climate interactions
NORA Subject Terms:	Ecology and Environment
Date made live:	02 Mar 2021 11:25 +0 (UTC)
URI:	https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529790

Actions (login required)

View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...