Intensive supplementary feeding improves the performance of wild bird seed plots in provisioning farmland birds throughout the winter: a case study in lowland England
Broughton, Richard K. 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-9628; Kettlewell, Michael G.W.; Maziarz, Marta ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-5713; Vickers, Stephen H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7809-8904; Larkman, Alan; Wilkinson, Ian.
2020
Intensive supplementary feeding improves the performance of wild bird seed plots in provisioning farmland birds throughout the winter: a case study in lowland England.
Bird Study, 67 (4).
409-419.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2021.1922356
|
Text
N529694PP.pdf - Accepted Version Download (929kB) | Preview |
Abstract/Summary
Capsule: Sown bird-food plots with intensive (daily) supplementary feeding throughout the winter attracted substantially greater numbers of seed-eating farmland birds than control plots without additional feeding, whose planted seed resource was exhausted by midwinter. Aims: We studied the performance of cultivated agri-environment scheme (AES) plots, predominantly growing winter bird seed (WBS), in addressing the ‘hungry gap’ of food scarcity for seed-eating farmland birds over the winter period. We assessed whether intensive supplementary feeding can improve AES-WBS plot performance to support greater numbers of birds over a longer period throughout the winter. Methods: Five monthly bird counts were conducted from November to March on AES-WBS plots on three farms during three winters, alongside assessment of standing seed availability on the plants. Daily supplementary feeding of 8-25 kg of mixed seeds was scattered directly onto each treatment plot, with additional seed provided in hanging birdfeeders. The density of target farmland birds, and the depletion of the standing seed resource on plants, was compared between treatment plots and controls over the winter, using generalised linear models. Results: Cultivated AES-WBS plots contained only c. 25% of their potential full capacity of seed availability at the beginning of winter, and this was exhausted by midwinter (January). Supplementary feeding attracted significantly greater numbers of farmland birds to AES-WBS plots than unfed controls, with up to 421 birds per plot, dominated by Common Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs, Yellowhammers Emberiza citronella and Common Linnets Linaria cannabina. Bird densities on fed plots peaked in the late winter (February) ‘hungry gap’, but the magnitude of peak densities varied between years and farms. Conclusion: Intensive supplementary feeding can substantially improve poor performance of AES-WBS plots in supporting farmland birds throughout the winter, particularly during the late winter ‘hungry gap’ when seed availability on AES-WBS plots is otherwise exhausted.
| Item Type: | Publication - Article |
|---|---|
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2021.1922356 |
| UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: | Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-) |
| ISSN: | 0006-3657 |
| Additional Keywords: | agri-environment schemes, common linnet, farmland biodiversity, farmland bird conservation, payment by results, public goods, yellowhammer |
| NORA Subject Terms: | Ecology and Environment Agriculture and Soil Science |
| Date made live: | 21 May 2021 13:38 +0 (UTC) |
| URI: | https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529694 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Document Downloads
Downloads for past 30 days
Downloads per month over past year
Altmetric
Altmetric
