nerc.ac.uk

80 questions for UK biological security

Kemp, Luke; Aldridge, David C.; Booy, Olaf; Bower, Hilary; Browne, Des; Burgmann, Mark; Burt, Austin; Cunningham, Andrew A.; Dando, Malcolm; Dick, Jaimie T.A.; Dye, Christopher; Weiss Evans, Sam; Gallardo, Belinda; Godfray, H. Charles J.; Goodfellow, Ian; Gubbins, Simon; Holt, Lauren A.; Jones, Kate E.; Kandil, Hazem; Martin, Phillip; McCaughan, Mark; McLeish, Caitríona; Meany, Thomas; Millett, Kathryn; ÓhÉigeartaigh, Sean S.; Patron, Nicola J.; Rhodes, Catherine; Roy, Helen E.; Shackelford, Gorm; Smith, Derek; Spence, Nicola; Steiner, Helene; Sundaram, Lalitha S.; Voeneky, Silja; Walker, John R.; Watkins, Harry; Whitby, Simon; Wood, James; Sutherland, William J.. 2021 80 questions for UK biological security. PLoS ONE, 16 (1), e0241190. 19, pp. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241190

Before downloading, please read NORA policies.
[img]
Preview
Text
N529498JA.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (697kB) | Preview

Abstract/Summary

Multiple national and international trends and drivers are radically changing what biological security means for the United Kingdom (UK). New technologies present novel opportunities and challenges, and globalisation has created new pathways and increased the speed, volume and routes by which organisms can spread. The UK Biological Security Strategy (2018) acknowledges the importance of research on biological security in the UK. Given the breadth of potential research, a targeted agenda identifying the questions most critical to effective and coordinated progress in different disciplines of biological security is required. We used expert elicitation to generate 80 policy-relevant research questions considered by participants to have the greatest impact on UK biological security. Drawing on a collaboratively-developed set of 450 questions, proposed by 41 experts from academia, industry and the UK government (consulting 168 additional experts) we subdivided the final 80 questions into six categories: bioengineering; communication and behaviour; disease threats (including pandemics); governance and policy; invasive alien species; and securing biological materials and securing against misuse. Initially, the questions were ranked through a voting process and then reduced and refined to 80 during a one-day workshop with 35 participants from a variety of disciplines. Consistently emerging themes included: the nature of current and potential biological security threats, the efficacy of existing management actions, and the most appropriate future options. The resulting questions offer a research agenda for biological security in the UK that can assist the targeting of research resources and inform the implementation of the UK Biological Security Strategy. These questions include research that could aid with the mitigation of Covid-19, and preparation for the next pandemic. We hope that our structured and rigorous approach to creating a biological security research agenda will be replicated in other countries and regions. The world, not just the UK, is in need of a thoughtful approach to directing biological security research to tackle the emerging issues.

Item Type: Publication - Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241190
UKCEH and CEH Sections/Science Areas: Biodiversity (Science Area 2017-)
ISSN: 1932-6203
Additional Information. Not used in RCUK Gateway to Research.: Open Access paper - full text available via Official URL link.
Additional Keywords: invasive species, bioengineering, veterinary diseases, national security, pandemics, medical risk factors, influenza viruses, synthetic biology
NORA Subject Terms: Health
Biology and Microbiology
Date made live: 26 Jan 2021 15:48 +0 (UTC)
URI: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/529498

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

Downloads for past 30 days

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...